Does - Judgment Search Results

Kingsland Vs. Dorsey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... adoption as by conception and that sincerely subscribing to what another has written for him does not constitute legal deceit or grounds for disbarment impeachment or other penalty and in this .....

R. Venkatesachary and ors. Vs. the Judge, Court of Small Causes and an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1949)2MLJ784

..... the definition of a building in the act includes a portion of a building it does not mean that the owner of a house portions of which have been let separately .....

T.A. Menon Vs. K.P. Parvathi Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad373

..... court of the district munsif in such court the question of the place of marriage does not arise here as it is admittedly outside the jurisdiction of the district munsif s .....

Vedakumpprath Pillai's son Muthu Vs. Kulathinkal Kuppan's son Narayana ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1949)2MLJ804

..... therefore there can be no justification for remitting the matter for enquiry into something which does not arise from the pleadings 8 in the course of his arguments mr kuttikrishna menon .....

Venkateswara Ettu Naicker Vs. Ayyammal and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad367

..... and is therefore set aside this point as to the void nature of the sale does not appear to have been argued in the lower court and has been raised for .....

Kuthiravattath Kottayil Kotharayan Alias Nallapata Nayar Alias Prabaka ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad355

..... of limitation is governed by article 144 limitation act it is stated that one mahant does not succeed another and any alienation by a particular mahant cannot enure beyond his lifetime .....

Nadiammai Achi and anr. Vs. Mariappa thevar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad625

..... with the words joint family the contention based upon section 25 a income tax act does not help the appellants section 25 a income tax act xi 11 of 1922 reads .....

In Re: S.V. Kishta Pillai

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad389

..... can be imposed the new section as amended by madras act xxv 25 of 1947 does not contain that provision at all so i set aside the conviction and sentence of .....

Penjuri Govindappa Vs. D- Chayyappa

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1949)2MLJ770

..... ryot has got a thrashing floor of his own which he is using and therefore does not stand in need of the thrashing floor provided by the landlord for these reasons .....

The Madras and Southern Maharattah Railway by Its General Manager Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad402

..... behalf of the respondent is that this civil revision petition is not competent as this does not involve any question touching jurisdiction i cannot accede to this argument also the trial .....