Does - Judgment Search Results

Roe Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

roe v doe 420 u s 307 1975 u s supreme court roe v doe 420 u s 307 1975...

Rambai Vottery and ors. Vs. Shivaprasad Vottery

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP1

..... defendant to challenge the valuation put by the plaintiff and invite a decision if he does not challenge the valuation put on the claim by the plaintiff in the trial court .....

Rambharose Anant Prasad Vs. the State Transport Appellate Authority, M ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP71

..... contrary view sub section 3 of section 47 of the act if read by itself does not throw any light on the controversy before us but if sections 47 and 57 .....

Manoharlal Gupta and ors. Vs. the Madhya Pradesh Electricity Board

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP38

..... not make any report excepting what is contained in ex d 1 ex d 1 does not make any reference to any enquiry or as to the reason how the wire .....

Dinkar Prabhakar Mahajan Vs. S.L. Agrawal and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP40

..... arises in a particular case to issue a show cause notice before inflicting a penalty does not depend on the authority s satisfaction that the person to be penalised has no .....

Gindan and ors. Vs. Barelal

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP83

..... mentioned in section 12 of the act but breach of clause iii of section 5 does not find place either in sections 11 and 12 of the act that being so .....

Deepchand Nayak Vs. Madhya Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, B ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1977MP42

..... they be transferred that question is answered either by the notification and if the notification does not specify the tribunal to which the claims would be transferred then they should remain .....

Kedarnath Mattulal Vaish and anr. Vs. Baboolal and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1976MP62

..... summons is m s mattulal kashinath through kedarnath s o mattulal kirana merchant which also does not indicatethat applicant was served either in the capacity or a partner or in the .....

Bharatsingh Vs. Rishi Kumar and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1977MP40

..... all 324 it was pointed out that undivided family in section 4 of the act does not mean an undivided hindu family but it applies to undivided families of all castes .....

Chaturbhujdas and anr. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1975MP209

..... the petitioners by his order dated 12 11 1970 held that the document in question does not contain the correct value of the property and the value set forth in the .....