Does - Judgment Search Results

Seaboard Air Line R. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 173 1959 as we said in minneapolis at 361 u s 186 although 5 11 does not authorize the commission to ignore the antitrust laws mclean trucking co v united states .....

State of Madhya Pradesh and anr. Vs. Col. Lal Rampal Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC820; 1966MhLJ503(SC); [1966]2SCR53

..... contention is ill founded what the ruler did by his order of april 3 1948 does not have been to make a great but to have passed an order purporting to .....

Commissioner, Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Vs. Nar ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1916; [1965]3SCR168

..... in which the expression occurs as meaning beingconnected with or in relation to the expression does notimport any control by the authorities who manage or administer the festival ahindu religious festival .....

Brij Kishore Gupta Vs. Vishwamitra Kapur

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1965]2SCR705

..... rent or for the eviction of a tenant from any premises to which section 54 does not apply the court or other authority shall have regard to the provisions of this .....

Sri La Sri Subramania Desiga Gnanasambanda Pandara Sannadhi, Trustee o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1965]2SCR934

..... pandarasannadhi the trustee 11 clause 4 of the scheme only confers a power and it does not direct the appointment of additional trustees in presenti or even in future indeed section .....

Shah Chhotalal Lallubhai and ors. Vs. Charity Commissioner, Bombay and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1965SC1611; 1965MhLJ617(SC); [1965]2SCR811

..... meritorious act prescribed by the scriptures of swetembar murti pujak jains the wider public interest does not require that this special charity for a section of the jain public should be .....

Master Construction Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1047; [1966]3SCR99; [1966]17STC360(SC)

..... court not to give leave to appeal to the party in the presentcase the act does not provide for a further remedy against the order made bythe commissioner in revision under .....

Amritsar Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1242; [1966]3SCR45; [1966]17STC405(SC)

..... of the contract but communication of the place where actual delivery is to be given does notrelate to the mode of performance but formation of the contract it seems tous with .....

Prabhakar Ramakrishna Jodh Vs. A.L. Pande and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [1965]2SCR713

..... be appointed on a written contract in the form prescribed in sch a but that does not mean that teachers have merely a contractual remedy against the governing body of the .....

indra Kumar Karnani Vs. Atul Chandra Patitundi and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC186; [1965]3SCR329

..... tenant explanation in thissub section a a tenant of the firstdegree means a tenant who does not hold under any other tenant b a tenant inferior to thetenant of the first .....