Skip to content


Does - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 2,199 results (0.163 seconds)
Dec 16 1968 (FN)

Ftc Vs. Texaco, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-16-1968

..... order against texaco the setting aside of which by the court of appeals the government does not contest reversed and remanded footnote 1 the sales commission arrangement between texaco and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 06 1968 (SC)

H.L. Sud, Income-tax Officer, Bombay Vs. Tata Engineering and Locomoti ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-06-1968

Reported in: [1969]71ITR457(SC); [1969]2SCR21

..... of business through a broker in the taxable territories in such circumstances that the broker does not in respect of such transactions deal directly with or on behalf of a non .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 22 1968 (SC)

Amolak Chand Vs. Raghuveer Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-22-1968

Reported in: AIR1968SC1203; 1968(16)BLJR779; 1968MhLJ706(SC); [1968]3SCR246

..... permitted to sign more than one nomination paper at the same election and if he does then his signature is operative only in the case of the paper which is first .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 03 1968 (SC)

Mansukhlal and Brothers Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City Ii

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-03-1968

Reported in: AIR1969SC835; [1969]73ITR546(SC); [1969]1SCR970

..... evasion in our opinion the high court was right in holding that the word avoided does not mean evaded and that it has been used in the sense of escapement to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 11 1968 (SC)

income Tax Officer Vs. M.K. Mohammed Kunhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-11-1968

Reported in: [1969]71ITR815(SC); 1968(0)KLT794(SC); [1969]2SCR65

..... not possible to derive any assistance from it 13 section 255 5 of the act does empower the appellate tribunal to regulate its own procedure but it is very doubtful if .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 22 1968 (SC)

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. Pangal Vittal Nayak and Co. P. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-22-1968

Reported in: [1969]74ITR754(SC); 1968(0)KLT860(SC)

..... of a different character from the profits and losses of the speculative transactions the assessee does speculation business on his own account with the members of the association the assessee also .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 1968 (SC)

Banaras State Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Uttar Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-13-1968

Reported in: [1969]74ITR863(SC)

..... act or regulation before the commencement of the constitution to such securities but section 8 does not use the expression government securities it uses the expression securities of the state government .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 1968 (SC)

income Tax Officer, Distt. Ii(ii), Kanpur and ors. Vs. Shri Mani Ram E ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-20-1968

Reported in: AIR1969SC543; [1969]72ITR203(SC); [1969]1SCR724

..... came into existence before the later one was ever framed under special circumstances the law does however admit of a subsequent actto be resorted to for this purpose but the conditions .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 18 1968 (SC)

K.M. Kanavi Vs. the State of Mysore

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-18-1968

Reported in: AIR1968SC1339; (1969)71BOMLR66; 1968CriLJ1510; [1968]3SCR821

..... president or vice president to whom a direction has been issued under sub section 2 does not comply with such direction he shall on conviction be punished with simple imprisonment for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 1968 (SC)

Kishanchand Narsinghdas Bhatia Vs. State Transport Appellate Authority ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-28-1968

Reported in: AIR1968SC1461; 1968(0)BLJR887; 1969MPLJ945(SC); [1968]3SCR605

..... the scope and ambit of the second proviso to s 58 2 of the act does not appear to have been canvassed before the high court and has not been raised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //