Does - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 7,674 results (0.479 seconds)Regents of Univ. of Cal. Vs. Doe
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-19-1997
..... no impact upon california s treasury because the question on which certiorari was granted does not encompass doe s alternative argument attacking the ninth circuit cases holding the university to be ..... government has agreed to indemnify a state instrumentality against litigation costs including adverse judgments does not divest the state agency of eleventh amendment immunity nothing in this court s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLml Limited Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-1997
Reported in: (1997)(94)ELT699TriDel
..... rate notification requires a voltage of 400 or more we hold that control panel imported does not qualify for concessional rate of duty under the aforesaid notification in the circumstances the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDinesh Greases Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-21-1997
Reported in: (1997)(72)LC589Tri(Chennai)
..... without payment of duty as to whether they satisfied this parameter their filing of declaration does not prima facie absolve them of their responsibility to ensure that they claimed the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Rajan Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-21-1997
Reported in: (1997)(96)ELT109Tri(Chennai)
..... without payment of duty as to whether they satisfied this parameter their filing of declaration does not prima facie absolve them of their responsibility to ensure that they claimed the benefit .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuper Sales Corporation Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-21-1997
Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT914Tri(Chennai)
..... arguments of the appellant to the effect that the process of bending shearing cutting etc does not amount to manufacture 4 in this connection he drew our attention to para 25 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKadex Stear (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jul-18-1997
Reported in: (1999)(114)ELT212Tri(Chennai)
..... no 84 71 however by exclusion clause chapter notes also stipulate that heading 84 71 does not cover machines incorporating or working in conjunction with an automatic data processing machine and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalama Industries Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-17-1997
Reported in: (1998)(100)ELT379TriDel
..... vats or like the parts cone were used as non return valves by the appellants does not cover the description u h no 84 81 the collector of central excise appeals .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTU.P. State Cement Corporation Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-16-1997
Reported in: (2000)(116)ELT557TriDel
..... factories are transferred to the chunar factory for the manufacture of cement the chunar factory does not manufacture clinker but only manufactures cement the movement of clinker is mostly in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Tata Exports Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-14-1997
Reported in: (1997)LC294Tri(Delhi)
..... standard specification for a series capacitor for power system is is 9835 1981 however this does not lead to the conclusion as contended by the learned counsel that motor capacitors are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAarvee Waxpol Tools (i) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-24-1997
Reported in: (1997)(95)ELT426TriDel
..... 1995 and not the latest one and further it only shows a nominal loss and does not indicate that the appellant will be put to undue hardship if they were required .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial