Does - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 9,921 results (0.295 seconds)Crown Shipping Agency Vs. Commissioner of Cus. (G)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-01-2001
Reported in: (2001)(74)ECC502
..... not permit any quicker revocation of the licence 5 we find that the impugned order does not sustain and is set aside orders of consequential relief are made
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Indore Cancer Foundation Vs. C.C., Mumbai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
..... application seeks restoration on the ground that the duty has been subsequently quantified however it does not appear that addendum issued to the commissioner s order has been filed before the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. the Supreme Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-16-2001
..... nil rate in terms of a notification rule 57r of the central excise rules 1944 does not permit credit to be taken where the capital goods are used exclusively for production .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, New Delhi Vs. M/S. Anu Auto Industries
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2001
..... the assessee s appeal was passed by the tribunal after hearing both sides the order does not contain anything to indicate that any argument based on the provisions of rule 57c .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCce, Meerut Vs. M/S. Glasstronics India Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-16-2001
..... law framed in the present application stands already decided by a high court the question does not survive for any further reference to high court under section 35g of the central .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. B.D.K. Process Control (P) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT353Tri(Bang.)
..... which matter flows this is based on the admitted position by the appellants that matter does flow through it and that even if it has additional function of protection of vibrations .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSandur Manganese and Iron Ores Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
Reported in: (2001)(96)LC498Tri(Chennai)
..... cause notice dt 7 10 1994 in the paper book is only in one page does not bear the signature of the collector but only the words sd and is attested .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Bharat Gears Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
..... are cleared at nil rate of duty the scheme of operation of rule 57f 4 does not result in such clearance according to him there is no other provision for reversal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Sigma Industries Vs. C.C.E., Chandigarh
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2001
..... were clearing these parts from chandigarh unit to mohali factory for punching drilling etc which does not amount to manufacture on job work basis he submits that on the date of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM. Balasubramaniam Vs. C.C. Chennai
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Mar-16-2001
..... had been granted permission to re export and therefore the question of imposing redemption fine does not arise in the matter 2 shri ms kumaraswamy learned consultant for the appellant submits .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial