Does - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1986 Page 1 of about 3,811 results (0.225 seconds)Muthu Paint Industries Private Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-06-1986
Reported in: (1986)(6)LC762Tri(Delhi)
..... of the limits prescribed under the notification as already stated the theory of loan licencee does not impress us we are also not impressed with the arguments that the show cause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMehboob Singh JaIn and Sons Vs. Collector of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-07-1986
Reported in: (1987)(27)ELT695TriDel
..... the collector releasing only contents of 4 envelopes and the tribunal s finding that deposition does not bring out whether there was any duress on shri daryao singh in giving that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Sharwan Kumar
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
Decided on: Aug-25-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD756(Asr.)
..... last day of the previous year for the purposes of the business of the undertaking does not exceed i in a case where the previous year ends before the 1st day .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Agarwal Stone Industries
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Aug-29-1986
Reported in: (1987)21ITD622(JP.)
..... manufactures or produces any article or thing the extraction of the stones from the earth does not result in manufacturing activity and therefore to come to the conclusion that it is .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRadhakrishna Oil Mills Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Aug-11-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD587(Coch.)
..... 350 that the record contemplated by section 35 of the indian income tax act 1922 does not mean only the order of assessment but it comprises all proceedings on which the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShrenik Kasturbhai (Huf) Vs. Gift-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Aug-21-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD252(Ahd.)
..... this particular case the gift is not revocable for a period of 6 years it does not mean that immediately on the expiry of the period of 6 years the gift .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTimperial Chemical Industries Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-06-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD275(Kol.)
..... and agreed to be paid by fact the case of mcdowell amp co ltd supra does not apply to the facts of this case because the assessee did not in any .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMiss Nirmal Kapoor Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-29-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD773(Delhi)
..... the hon ble jammu and kashmir high court referred to above is that the act does not apply to the state of jammu and kashmir it would mean that no assessment .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWealth-tax Officer Vs. Miss Alka Mahajan
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jul-31-1986
Reported in: (1986)19ITD425(Delhi)
..... wealth of the assessees and once it is treated so then it implies that it does belong to the assessees hence section 5 1 iv is applicable in ced v jyotirmoy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh Kumar Kothari Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Oct-20-1986
Reported in: (1987)20ITD202(JP.)
..... their lordships of the rajasthan high court supra even on the legal issue the assessee does not seem to have any merit in the present appeal and on this basis respectfully .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial