Skip to content


Does - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 9,156 results (0.161 seconds)
Mar 29 2000 (FN)

Santaandnbsp;fe Independent School Dist. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-29-2000

..... of the october policy insulates the continuation of such prayers from constitutional scrutiny it does not our inquiry into this question not only can but must include an examination of ..... reproach based solely on the remote possibility that those attempts may fail this policy likewise does not survive a facial challenge because it impermissibly imposes upon the student body a majoritarian .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Gujarat Machinery Mfgrs. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC351

..... rule 173l for the collector to condone the delay in the receipt of he goods does not arise in the absence of a request being made it noted that the representative .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2000 (TRI)

Casio India Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT379TriDel

..... 5 opposing the arguments shri m p singh ld dr submitted that heading 84 71 does not cover the type of electronic diaries imported in the present matter that heading 84 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 06 2000 (TRI)

Gomti Carbon Dioxide Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-06-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC645

..... buyer since this is the amount received subsequent to the sale from the depots and does not fall within the ambit of any of the expenses held includible in bombay tyre .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2000 (TRI)

Bentley and Remington Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Jun-02-2000

Reported in: (2000)(93)LC137Tri(Bang.)alore

..... been clearly held that where there is approved classification the question of confirming short levy does not arise and demands have to be prospective in view of the cited judgment of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Gurera Synthetics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2000)(71)ECC162

..... cited as evidence in support of various technical literature and indian standard specifications the commissioner does not indicate in his order while he concludes that the dimensions of the gallery are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 02 2000 (TRI)

M/S Shree Cement Ltd. Vs. Cce Jaipur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-02-2000

..... of lime stone as it is now a settled law that crushing of the limestone does not amount to manufacture of excisable commodity reliance was placed on the decision in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 01 2000 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Charak Pharmaceuticals

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-01-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT748Tri(Mum.)bai

..... commissioner appeals found in favour of the assessee on both counts the department s appeal does not question his view that equalised freight was not to be included in the assessable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 31 2000 (TRI)

Himson Textile Engineering Inds. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-31-2000

Reported in: (2001)(127)ELT751Tri(Mum.)bai

..... not qualify under the term capital goods the commissioner appeals summed it as saying it does not play any part in the manufacture of the finished goods 3 i observe that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 07 2000 (TRI)

Aristo Pharmaceutical Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-07-2000

Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT386TriDel

..... of rules 9 and 49 the question of considering the marketability after expiry of date does not arise accordingly we reject the appeal filed by the appellants

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //