Skip to content


Does - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1969 Page 1 of about 3,158 results (0.169 seconds)
Dec 31 1969 (FN)

Eilenbecker Vs. District Court of Plymouth County

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

..... upon application for a writ of habeas corpus and presented as the case now before us does the question of the authority of the circuit court to impose this imprisonment on a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Bhop Singh and ors. Vs. Debi Singh

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1875)ILR1All709

..... in suits for moveable and immoveable property where the amount or value of the claim does not exceed rs 5 000 five per cent is the largest amount payable by any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Ram Dayal Vs. Mahtab Singh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1885)ILR7All506

..... have been competent for the judge himself to take notice of it going as it does to the very root of the proceedings but under any circumstances we in a suit .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Muhammad Mashuk Ali Khan and ors. Vs. Khuda Baksh

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1887)ILR9All622

..... conferred by section 42 of the specific relief act by a court of first instance does not in itself constitute a sufficient ground for the reversal of a decree which is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Phula Bibi Vs. Karim Bakhsh and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1886)ILR8All102

..... if this is so the agreement so far runs with the land and if it does so to any extent it must in my opinion do so to the full extent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Sheo NaraIn Vs. Hira

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1885)ILR7All535

..... the 20th august 1881 the reason why pre emption in respect of the former sale does not go with the subsequent sale is that while it may be that the plaintiff .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Queen-empress Vs. Subhan and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1896)ILR18All395

..... and that there was no intention of wounding the feelings of any one section 297 does not make an act committed in defiance of it an offence when that act is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Mulmantri and anr. Vs. Ashfak Ahmad and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1887)ILR9All605

..... which made certain orders in the execution department decrees and therefore appealable but that definition does not appear to have been brought to the attention of the learned judges who decided .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Kalka Vs. Bandi Bibi

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1887)ILR9All602

..... 3 all 554 to which i have referred i am of opinion that the action does lie in the civil court as to the other point whether the property was sold .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 31 1969 (HC)

Gulab Dai Vs. Jiwan Ram and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-31-1969

Reported in: (1880)ILR2All320

..... that section and it is observable that the dismissal of a suit under that section does not preclude the institution of a fresh suit within the time allowed by the law .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //