Skip to content


Does - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 11,155 results (0.248 seconds)
Oct 18 2002 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Doe Jones Investment and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Oct-18-2002

1 m s doe jones investment amp consultants pvt ltd was a member of the calcutta stock exchange and was...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 20 2002 (FN)

Gonzaga Univ. Vs. Doe

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-20-2002

..... overheard one student tell another that respondent engaged in acts of sexual misconduct against jane doe a female undergraduate league launched an investigation and contacted the state agency responsible for ..... language with individually focused termi 4 the court correctly states that rights language alone does not necessarily create rights enforceable under 1983 ante at 289 n 7 quoting pennhurst .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2002 (TRI)

G.T.C. Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

Reported in: (2002)(83)ECC442

..... the decision of the apex court which is relied on by the bombay bench also does not take a different view relevant portion of the above decision collector of central excise .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2002 (TRI)

Durga Toy Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC253Tri(Chennai)

..... in this view of the matter therefore the order passed by the lower appellate authority does not call for any interference so far as it relates to the confiscation of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2002 (TRI)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC836Tri(Kol.)kata

..... the revenue that the present goods is covered by sub rule 1 of rule 9 does not appeal to us inasmuch as for removal from the warehouses the relevant rule is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2002 (TRI)

Auto Ignition Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Acc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-11-2002

Reported in: (2002)(144)ELT631Tri(Mum.)bai

..... new custom house mumbai the said notice was adjudicated by the commissioner airport mumbai who does not have any jurisdiction in the absence of any specific order of the central government .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 11 2002 (TRI)

Deepa Sons Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-11-2002

Reported in: (2002)(104)LC187Tri(Mum.)bai

..... see substance in the submission of the appellant that serial no 16 of appendix 35 does not restrict electronic musical instruments and keyboards falling under a particular heading and others for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 2002 (TRI)

S.V. Electricals Limited Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-15-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC325Tri(Delhi)

..... on perusal of section 84 of the finance act 1994 we note that this section does not empower the commissioner to review the orders passed by the authorities below under him .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 15 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. M.P. Electricals Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-15-2002

Reported in: (2002)(145)ELT635TriDel

..... time barred as contended by the respondents this order i e dated 16 10 97 does not contain any direction to the dy commissioner central excise bhopal to file an appeal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2002 (TRI)

Surya Prabha Mills Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-19-2002

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC362

..... rule 57g of the c e rules the circular clarifies that this date of limitation does not cite any cases of capital goods as it may not always be possible to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //