Does - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: does Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 3,329 results (0.204 seconds)Tulsidas Khimji Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-29-1983
Reported in: (1983)LC384DTri(Delhi)
..... this schedule therefore the question of extending the benefits of the notification to the appellants does not arise in the result the appeal is rejected
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGift-tax Officer Vs. P. Krishnamoorthy
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Oct-14-1983
Reported in: (1984)8ITD10(Mad.)
..... of the shares as a coparcenary of the huf even after the transfer this contention does not postulate that what was transferred was only two thirds of the interest in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajpath Club Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Dec-22-1983
Reported in: (1986)17ITD192(Ahd.)
..... exigible to tax in other word according to the learned departmental representative since the surplus does not constitute the assessees income on the ground of mutuality the loss in the instant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Smt. Sudershan Kumari
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Amritsar
Decided on: Dec-09-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD544(Asr.)
..... to note that section 64 is not applicable in the case of a huf and does not require or permit the inclusion of the income of the wife of the karta .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalico Industrial Engineers Vs. First Additional Income-tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-15-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD491(Mum.)
..... provision of law in our opinion the reopening of the assessment under section 147 6 does not in any manner violate against the principle of law as explained by the learned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTextile Agencies Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD251(Delhi)
..... service of the said notice the submission of the learned departmental representative that the assessee does not refuse having received the assessment order which also bore initiation of penalty proceedings under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Leela Purie Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-26-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD130(Delhi)
..... be stated that she realised a part of the price which she paid but that does not mean that the cost of acquisition has in any way been effected it remained .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMopeds India Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-30-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD324(Hyd.)
..... uncon tradicted the fact that the assessee was able to salvage part of the liability does not mean that the assessee could be credited with hindsight at the time of closing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRayalaseema Passenger and Goods Vs. Inspecting Assistant
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Oct-21-1983
Reported in: (1984)7ITD111(Mad.)
..... appeal the assessee would have been certainly entitled to 40 per cent depreciation 4 then does it make any difference because the assessee instead of an appeal required only a rectification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTincome-tax Officer Vs. Gujarat Handicraft and Handloom
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Dec-30-1983
Reported in: (1984)9ITD488(Ahd.)
..... that merely because the recipient treats it subsequently in his own account as its own does not alter that character in coming to this decision their lordships had considered the decision .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial