Same Case - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 659 results (0.285 seconds)- Case No.0 of N Vijay Soren Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-06-2013
inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w p hbcr no 344of2012 vijaysoren petitioner versus thestateofjharkhandandothers respondents coram hon blemr justiced n patel hon blemr justices...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“case Is Fixed for Filing Correct Address of the Vs. Ranjit Singh
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
heard impugned order dated 28 01 2013 reads as under case is fixed for filing correct address of the accused by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCase No. : C. R. No. 798 of 2005 Vs. Ram Singh .... Petitioner
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh sr no 698 case no c r no 798 of 2005 date of decision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCase No. : Crl. Revn. No. 2759 of 2011 Vs. Lt. Col. Ashish Poonia .... ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-14-2013
i have heard counsel for the respondent and perused the case file whereas none has appeared for the petitioner on 08
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCase No. : C. R. No. 7219 of 2012 (Oandm) Vs. Verinder and Vikram Sing ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh sr no 220 case no c r no 7219 of 2012 o m date
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn the Case of Ajit Chandra Majumdar Vs. Akhil Chandra Majumdar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-10-2013
..... an extension of the will moreover there is authority in the case of ajit chandra majumdar versus akhil chandra majumdar reported in air ..... be probated see gardiner versus counthope 1886 12 pd 14 on the same analogy i see no reason why this unattested codicil should not ..... the ground that the codicil had not been attested in the same manner as the will in those circumstances the propounders were asked .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“ Now Coming to the Case of the Petitioner It Is a Matter of Vs. Unk ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
engineer has passed the following order not coming to the case of the petitioner it is a matter of record that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Record of the Case Was Burnt in Accidental Fire in High Vs. K.L.Ma ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
..... advocate for respondent no 2 himachal roadways nawab singh j oral the record of the case was burnt in accidental fire in high court building paper book has been re constructed ..... till the amount was deposited by the respondent corporation under the impugned award at the same rate of interest as was awarded by the tribunal september 17 2013 nawab singh gian .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“5. in the Present Case I Have Intensively Vs. State of Punjab and A ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
..... delinquent namely karnail singh who had been found guilty in the same very inquiry report had been exonerated whereas the petitioner has ..... appellate authority reads in the following terms 5 in the present case i have intensively considered the file of departmental inquiry and ..... taking approval from the senior authority and without bringing the same to the notice to the any senior official in this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT“ Now Coming to the Case of the Petitioner It Is a Matter of Vs. Unk ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-22-2013
rejected by passing the following order not coming to the case of the petitioner it is a matter of record that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial