Same Case - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 49,849 results (0.293 seconds)Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Arpit Marbles (P) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT387TriDel
..... there had been clandestine removal of the goods they framed a case on the basis of production of marble crazy of 2988 mt ..... removal of the goods during the period in question but the same has been wrongly ignored by the commissioner appeals according to him ..... for demanding the duty by attributing the clandestine removal of the same we don t find any illegality or impropriety in the impugned .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Manmade Spinners (i) Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-22-2003
Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT884Tri(Mum.)bai
sufficient therefore the deposit made by the assessee in this case is perfectly valid
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat Tractor Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus. (Appeal ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-27-2003
Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT372Tri(Mum.)bai
should have been obtained from the competent authority in this case such a permission has not been obtained by the appellant
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThirumalai Chemicals Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: May-26-2003
Reported in: (2006)STR157
of the service tax which is done in the present case is required to be re assessed in the light of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Galaxy Entertainment
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT244Tri(Mum.)bai
accept it on the ground that this is a new case now sought to be made and this clause was not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKailash Chand JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC409
a 349 2002 nb dated 18 3 2002 in the case of shri kailash chand jain 2 shri a k jain
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maxxon India Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-23-2003
Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC398
..... factory premises into granules which are also cleared at nil rate of duty under the same notification that the show cause notice was issued for recovery of amount of modvat credit ..... 31 3 98 on the respondents being pointed out that the tribunal in their own case as reported in 1994 72 elt 483 had allowed their appeal when the matter was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNiwas Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-22-2003
to say that the applicant has a prima facie strong case on merits 5 the only contention on limitation is that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGenuine Spares (India) Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: May-22-2003
Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT194TriDel
that similar order would be just and proper in these cases also therefore we direct the appellant m s genuine spares
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRatnamani Metals and Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: May-28-2003
central excise rules as held by the tribunal in the case of bharat heavy electricals ltd v cce indore 2001 127
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial