Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 49,849 results (0.293 seconds)
Jan 01 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Arpit Marbles (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT387TriDel

..... there had been clandestine removal of the goods they framed a case on the basis of production of marble crazy of 2988 mt ..... removal of the goods during the period in question but the same has been wrongly ignored by the commissioner appeals according to him ..... for demanding the duty by attributing the clandestine removal of the same we don t find any illegality or impropriety in the impugned .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Manmade Spinners (i) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT884Tri(Mum.)bai

sufficient therefore the deposit made by the assessee in this case is perfectly valid

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 27 2003 (TRI)

Gujarat Tractor Corporation Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus. (Appeal ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-27-2003

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT372Tri(Mum.)bai

should have been obtained from the competent authority in this case such a permission has not been obtained by the appellant

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 26 2003 (TRI)

Thirumalai Chemicals Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: May-26-2003

Reported in: (2006)STR157

of the service tax which is done in the present case is required to be re assessed in the light of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Galaxy Entertainment

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-23-2003

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT244Tri(Mum.)bai

accept it on the ground that this is a new case now sought to be made and this clause was not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2003 (TRI)

Kailash Chand JaIn Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-23-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC409

a 349 2002 nb dated 18 3 2002 in the case of shri kailash chand jain 2 shri a k jain

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 23 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Maxxon India Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-23-2003

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC398

..... factory premises into granules which are also cleared at nil rate of duty under the same notification that the show cause notice was issued for recovery of amount of modvat credit ..... 31 3 98 on the respondents being pointed out that the tribunal in their own case as reported in 1994 72 elt 483 had allowed their appeal when the matter was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2003 (TRI)

Niwas Spinning Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-22-2003

to say that the applicant has a prima facie strong case on merits 5 the only contention on limitation is that

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 22 2003 (TRI)

Genuine Spares (India) Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: May-22-2003

Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT194TriDel

that similar order would be just and proper in these cases also therefore we direct the appellant m s genuine spares

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 2003 (TRI)

Ratnamani Metals and Tubes Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs and Centra ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: May-28-2003

central excise rules as held by the tribunal in the case of bharat heavy electricals ltd v cce indore 2001 127

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //