Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 602 results (0.208 seconds)
Apr 06 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Divya Cases, Dicen Watch Cases (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Apr-06-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC494

..... out within the same factory which squarely covers the appellants case in the present case also the appellants have manufactured the watch case which is excisable ..... by the clients themselves and the price for supply of watch cases manufactured by them were fixed that their belief was also ..... judgment rendered in the case of andhra pradesh paper mills ltd vs cce 2002 149 elt 1000 on the same point 3 on a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 2004 (TRI)

In Re: Vedant Steel Casing Private

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Mar-31-2004

..... 2001 it is observed that even in the case of other companies which are in the same industry such as infosys wipro etc the income ..... made by m s vedant steel casing private limited and hence it is presumed that they are admitting the same 6 1 8 i also note ..... above acquisition of shares the same has not been complied with and accordingly i find that m s vedant steel casing private limited has acted in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2004 (TRI)

Kanchan Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-22-2004

Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT453TriDel

..... been misplaced that it has been held by the tribunal in the case of b m auto india v cce 2001 132 e l t ..... has been provided for filing the application for restoration of appeals the same has to be filed within a reasonable period of time she therefore ..... taken more than 31 2 years in filing the restoration application the same deserves to be dismissed 4 we have considered the submissions of both .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2004 (TRI)

Vision Trade Links Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Apr-27-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC487

at higher price there is no material in the present case to show that the transaction value did not represent the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2004 (TRI)

Sun Pharmaceuticals Ind. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2004

leads us to the view that no strong prima facie case for total waiver has been made out in view of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 2004 (TRI)

i.T.D.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-23-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT343Tri(Mum.)bai

..... duty burden has not been passed to their customers which the appellants in the instant case have failed to establish is required to be accepted as such i do not find .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kcp Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Apr-22-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT49Tri(Chennai)

clarificatory circular of the board touching the merits of the case which was in favour of the revenue was received in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2004 (TRI)

Ksh International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-22-2004

Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT575Tri(Mum.)bai

job worker are misdirected c duty demand made in this case on entire quantity cannot be upheld

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2004 (TRI)

Bongaigaon Refinery and Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Apr-22-2004

Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC590

..... 14 5 93 it is the case of the appellants that they did not receive a copy of the same and only subsequently a copy of the same was received by them on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 21 2004 (TRI)

R.L. Makhija Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-21-2004

Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT150Tri(Mum.)bai

the central excise rules 1944 for his involvement in the case 3 the commissioner in his impugned order no where discussed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //