Same Case - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 602 results (0.208 seconds)Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Divya Cases, Dicen Watch Cases (P)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Apr-06-2004
Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC494
..... out within the same factory which squarely covers the appellants case in the present case also the appellants have manufactured the watch case which is excisable ..... by the clients themselves and the price for supply of watch cases manufactured by them were fixed that their belief was also ..... judgment rendered in the case of andhra pradesh paper mills ltd vs cce 2002 149 elt 1000 on the same point 3 on a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Vedant Steel Casing Private
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Mar-31-2004
..... 2001 it is observed that even in the case of other companies which are in the same industry such as infosys wipro etc the income ..... made by m s vedant steel casing private limited and hence it is presumed that they are admitting the same 6 1 8 i also note ..... above acquisition of shares the same has not been complied with and accordingly i find that m s vedant steel casing private limited has acted in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanchan Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-22-2004
Reported in: (2004)(168)ELT453TriDel
..... been misplaced that it has been held by the tribunal in the case of b m auto india v cce 2001 132 e l t ..... has been provided for filing the application for restoration of appeals the same has to be filed within a reasonable period of time she therefore ..... taken more than 31 2 years in filing the restoration application the same deserves to be dismissed 4 we have considered the submissions of both .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVision Trade Links Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Apr-27-2004
Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC487
at higher price there is no material in the present case to show that the transaction value did not represent the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSun Pharmaceuticals Ind. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Cen. Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-23-2004
leads us to the view that no strong prima facie case for total waiver has been made out in view of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTi.T.D.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-23-2004
Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT343Tri(Mum.)bai
..... duty burden has not been passed to their customers which the appellants in the instant case have failed to establish is required to be accepted as such i do not find .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kcp Limited
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Apr-22-2004
Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT49Tri(Chennai)
clarificatory circular of the board touching the merits of the case which was in favour of the revenue was received in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKsh International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-22-2004
Reported in: (2004)(170)ELT575Tri(Mum.)bai
job worker are misdirected c duty demand made in this case on entire quantity cannot be upheld
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBongaigaon Refinery and Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Apr-22-2004
Reported in: (2004)(94)ECC590
..... 14 5 93 it is the case of the appellants that they did not receive a copy of the same and only subsequently a copy of the same was received by them on .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.L. Makhija Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-21-2004
Reported in: (2004)(169)ELT150Tri(Mum.)bai
the central excise rules 1944 for his involvement in the case 3 the commissioner in his impugned order no where discussed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial