Same Case - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 35,248 results (0.329 seconds)N.V.K. Mohamed Sultan Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Jan-03-2000
Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT53Tri(Chennai)
..... has emanated and as the matter is a very old one the same was listed the matter had been coming up for hearing and several ..... high court for answering the questions raised 4 the facts of the case are that the appellants had manufactured roja suganda supari which are scented ..... and interpretation of notification in question and as a result of the same the refund claim arise in terms of section 35g 1 of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavi Paints and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-11-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT721Tri(Chennai)
..... aside by commissioner appeals and that they had availed the credit on same inputs available in stock at the commencement of the succeeding financial ..... was right in seeking recovery of rs 3 47 312 and the same was required to have been pre deposited by them 7 on ..... raised by them and decide the case de novo the appeal is remanded with the above directions and same shall be heard only after appellants .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHmtd Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-17-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT749Tri(Mum.)bai
..... one cross objection relate to the proceeding arising out of the same show cause notice these are therefore being disposed of together vide this ..... the product and the manufacturer he observed that in the instant case the documentation showed that the buyers viz m s gopi electronics ..... in notification no 75 87 the prohibition was worded in the same manner in both the notifications the goods supplied by m s .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs Vs. Special Prints Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-17-2000
Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT813Tri(Mum.)bai
ltd wherein he confirmed the demands of interest in the case of warehoused goods which were cleared subsequent to the permissible
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat State Export Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT632Tri(Mum.)bai
infirmity in the impugned order this appeal is allowed the case is remanded to the jurisdictional commissioner to decide the issue
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Pankaj Aero Chemicals
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-2000
Reported in: (2000)(122)ELT136Tri(Mum.)bai
1 the very short point involved in this case is the classification of the product geraniol manufactured by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWipro Ge Medical Systems Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2000
Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT810TriDel
..... within the normal period of limitation 2 the appellants have prayed for transfer of their case to south zonal bench chennai keeping in view the nature of the dispute and the ..... made in the bill we do not find any merit in this appeal and the same is rejected the misc application also stands disposed of accordingly ordered accordingly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR.D. Extrusions (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-16-2000
Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT807TriDel
be that as it may since we find an arguable case for the appellant we waive the condition of deposit of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMorvi Vegetable Products Ltd. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex. and Cus.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-11-2000
Reported in: (2000)(121)ELT821Tri(Mum.)bai
we are satisfied that applicant has a strong prima facie case on both these aspects explanation 4 to the notification is
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJyothi Malleables (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Decided on: Aug-17-2000
Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT718Tri(Chennai)
..... parts which are supplied to customers who in turn subject the same for further machining to manufacture finished machine parts are classifiable under ..... the issue was covered by the tribunal judgment rendered in the case of shivaji works ltd v cce as reported in 1994 69 ..... 202 88 is required to be extended another proceeding against the same appellant was also set aside by final order nos 340 to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial