Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1926 Page 1 of about 383 results (0.255 seconds)
Mar 23 1926 (PC)

Raja Rishee Case Law Vs. Manik Molla and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-23-1926

Reported in: 96Ind.Cas.64

judgment debtor that is the general rule but in a case where property in which the judgment debtor has no saleable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 10 1926 (PC)

Ramanadhan Chettiar Vs. Ramachandra Sivaji Ghantikae and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-10-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad1129; 97Ind.Cas.754

is clearly inapplicable 2 it is then argued that the case comes within section 146 of the code of civil procedure

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 1926 (PC)

Rajah Saheb Mahabhan Doostan Sri Rajah Rao Venkata Kumar Mahipati Sury ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-11-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad897

originally fixed separately were afterwards consolidated by an arrangement a case not set up in the original plaint 3 both on

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 1926 (PC)

Sellan Vs. Vettiyan Parayan

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-25-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad944a; 97Ind.Cas.895

..... occasions to enable him to produce his witnesses 2 the practice of posting too many cases which could not by any possibility be disposed of in a day is responsible for ..... upon the day in which they are posted the plaintiff might have thought that the same would not be taken up on 21 1 24 to which it was adjourned seeing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 09 1926 (PC)

Srinivasa Iyengar Vs. K.R. Aravamudu Iyengar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-09-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad690

the judgment debtor or his legal representative in the present case it cannot bet said that the 2nd respondent is the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 28 1926 (PC)

Lalumia Vs. Mazur Hannisa

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-28-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad698

can be distinguished from the application for arrest in the case of application for delivery we have nothing to do with

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1926 (PC)

Ratna Mudaliar and anr. Vs. C. Vijiaranga Mudaliar

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-06-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad762; 95Ind.Cas.581

v damodaram chetty 1912 m w n 972 in that case there were four undivided brothers with no nucleus of family

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1926 (PC)

Roy Musal Naidu Vs. Thandalam Virasami Reddi and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-08-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad902; 97Ind.Cas.384

..... towards interest it is no objection that he paid towards principal and interest at the same time 3 this has been decided in ramakrishna annayi v pichandi chetiar a i r ..... the debt or by his agent the question is then whether any sum in this case was paid as interest and as such an appropriation by the creditor to interest has .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 22 1926 (PC)

K.P.S. Karuthan Chettiar Vs. R.M.M. Raman Chetti

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-22-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad1159

1917 40 mad 630 that no appeal lies in this case that decision was one under the insolvency act of 1907

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1926 (PC)

(Pamur) Atchi Reddi and ors. Vs. Nelaturu Venkata Rangacharlu and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: May-03-1926

Reported in: AIR1926Mad1140

..... be considered 3 i cannot see why the plaintiffs should insist on combining in the same suit two or three different causes of action in which all are not interested if ..... goundan 1920 43 mad 567 quoted by the learned subordinate judge apply pre eminently to cases like the present one 4 i therefore dismiss the petition with costs

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //