Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Case-swayne Co., Inc. Vs. Sunkist Growers, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... allowances shall be issued and distributed solely by sunkist petitioner case swayne manufactures single strength orange juice and other blended orange ..... 1920 remarks of senator walsh 62 cong rec 2271 1922 same 62 cong rec 2273 1922 remarks of senator norris see ..... under the sherman act hence since the complaint in this case encompassed a charge that certain arrangements between sunkist and the .....

Penn-central Merger and N and W Inclusion Cases.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but who have not perfected such appeals shall docket their cases on or before the same date appellees shall file their motions in response to ..... on applications for stay penn central merger and n w inclusion cases 389 u s 946 1967 946 continued applications for a stay ..... side the division of time to be settled among counsel the case is to be submitted upon the oral arguments the jurisdictional papers .....

K.M. Lakshmanan Vs. the State of Madras, Represented by the Collector ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1968)2MLJ208

using other machinery and equipment it will really be a case of starting a new rice mill and not shifting the

Kansara Kantilal Fogatlal Vs. Bai Maniben D/O. Kansara Chunilal Dajibh ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1969)10GLR451

of which is the basis of the suit in this case the suit is not for the payment of rent demanded

Baroda Borough Municipality Vs. Soma Bhaiji

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1967)8GLR907

..... has preferred appeals against the decisions of the mamlatdar in all the cases which were referred to him by the civil court the learned ..... revision application no 50 of 1966 in which relying on the same decision of raju j in civil revision application no 164 of ..... of the bombay tenancy and agricultural lands act relate to the same subject matter and must therefore be read together and reading these .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pratap Rai

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1968Raj44; (1968)ILLJ489Raj

absence without leave into extraordinary leave 10 in the present case other leave was admittedly admissible to the respondent the respondent

Hiralal Chhaganlal and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1968Raj188

the act 46 in view of all the circumstancesof the case we leave the parties to beartheir own costs that sub

Union of India (Uoi) Represented by the Commissioner of Income-tax, Ma ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1969Mad212

..... and the petitioner in the civil revision petition is one and the same namely the union of india represented by the commissioner of income ..... no bearing whatever on the right to restitution suppose in a particular case the court has awarded rs x by way of costs by ..... the first contention is concerned i have no doubt whatever that the same is absolutely untenable the right to get restitution is a right .....

S.P. Subbiah Vs. Pr. Pr. Sp. Periakaruppan Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1967]37CompCas270(Mad)

..... an absurdity if the claim of the liquidator for interest as in this case were to be upheld in order to harmoniously interpret the intention of ..... that he has no objection to collect the money and deposit the same in this court and for the third party mortgagee herein being paid ..... out the same i also direct that as and when the moneys are so collected .....

K.M. Jamal Mydeen Vs. the State of Madras

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1968]22STC45(Mad)

..... upon the land would be in the nature of a licence if it is a case where he is to remove the goods immediately upon the grant of the right but ..... have been treated as a first seller and assessed to pay sales tax and the same articles cannot be subjected to tax at more than one point 4 for all the .....