Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1930 Page 1 of about 395 results (0.236 seconds)
Apr 11 1930 (PC)

Raja Reshee Case Law Vs. Satish Chandra Pal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-11-1930

Reported in: AIR1931Cal397

..... 1906 the government resumed the paikan lands and settled the same with the zamindar plaintiff s predecessor the zamindar settled these ..... suit had no right to grant a lease of the same the suit was decreed and the present defendants predecessor s ..... greaves and panton jj delivered their judgment in the previous apportionment case still continues and that the question of dispossession and suspension .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 21 1930 (PC)

(Moparthi) Nayudamma and ors. Vs. (Sreemanthuraja Yarlagada) Ankineedu ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-21-1930

Reported in: AIR1931Mad640

b 1 the minimum fee is rs 25 for all cases not falling under clauses 1 2 3 section 7 court

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1930 (PC)

Krishna Gobinda Chatterji Vs. Mt. Kishoribala Debi

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-02-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Cal753,129Ind.Cas.103

..... with perpetual injunction as is indicated by section 53 of the same act the law as regards temporary injunction is to be found ..... injury of a like kind arising out of the same contractor relating to the same property or right in my opinion that doer not ..... cover in the circumstances of the case an injunction restraining the defendant .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 1930 (PC)

Kusum Baistami and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-21-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Cal638,129Ind.Cas.358

..... not maintainable and secondly that the judgment is not in accordance with law since the cases of the individual accused have not been separately considered as far as i can see ..... the following order prostitutes are still occupying the houses and they are still using the same as brothels thus it will appear that they have not carried out orders passed on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 12 1930 (PC)

Preotama Devi Vs. Chandra Kumar Ghosh and anr.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-12-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Cal594

to be parson seeking to recover on his behalf the cases show that the court has jurisdiction to assign the bond

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1930 (PC)

In Re: Sojoni Kanta Das

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-03-1930

Reported in: AIR1930Cal244

..... its main features are said to be that the judge and the prosecutor is the same man that so many of the judges are foreigners generally englishmen who have little acquaintance ..... the advocacy of which is otherwise illegal no such question need be considered in this case the words of the section are brings or attempts to bring into hatred or contempt .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 1930 (PC)

Kashi Bashi Saha Firm Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-19-1930

Reported in: AIR1932Cal369

cuming j 1 the petitioners in this case were ordered under section 2 eastern bengal and assam disorderly

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 14 1930 (PC)

Debendranath Mandal Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-14-1930

Reported in: AIR1932Cal286

..... order was to remain in force for two months on 15th september of the same year the petitioners disobeyed the order and took out a procession which passed a ..... superintendent of police for a license they were convicted under section 32 of the same act and sentenced each to pay a fine of rs 25 they have now ..... cuming j 1 the facts of the case which have given rise to this rule are briefly as follows on 30th .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 27 1930 (PC)

Sudarsan Poddar Vs. Manindra Chandra Pal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Nov-27-1930

Reported in: AIR1932Cal80

..... a decree holder by attachment of other decrees passed by other courts or by the same court those two ways are indicated in order 21 rule 53 if it is a ..... be employed by the present plaintiffs but it may be noticed that the present plaintiffs case was that the decree itself namely the decree in suit no 99 of 1917 was .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1930 (PC)

Ramabrahmam Vs. Gudimalla Andalamma

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-28-1930

Reported in: AIR1931Mad597

insolvency act it is possible that as alleged in this case such a sale may be collusive and in execution of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //