Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Case Vs. Bowles

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the judicial code giving this court exclusive jurisdiction to try cases between a state and the united states prevents a district ..... the judicial code does give this court exclusive jurisdiction to try cases between a state and the united states section 205 c of ..... these are essential to the state government the use of the same criterion in measuring the constitutional power of congress to tax has .....

Khan Bahadur Chowkaran Keloth Mammad Keyi Vs. the Province of Madras R ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1946)1MLJ337

section 1 of section 48 says that except in the case provided for in section 36 which does not apply here

Mukkara Rudrappa Chetti Vs. the Karvetnagar Trust Estate, by Its Execu ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1947)1MLJ248

landlord was not entitled to charge a higher rent the case falling within section 13 3 of the madras estates land

In Re: Narayanaswami Mudali

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1947)1MLJ364

the purchase sale or distribution of kerosene in the present case the only evidence is that the petitioner conducted a solitary

F.P.S. Albuquerque Vs. the Catholic Bank Ltd. by Its Secretary, Mr. C. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1946Mad352; (1946)1MLJ244

of the limitation act in the circumstances of the present case 5 in the result therefore the appeal is dismissed with

Hanumantha Gowd Vs. the Official Receiver

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1946Mad503; (1946)1MLJ247

which one of us was a party in the latter case it was held that when the adjudication of a coparcener

T. Ponnirula Pillai Vs. the Western India Oil Distributing Company Lim ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1946Mad470; (1946)1MLJ264

..... v nagappa 1917 34 m l j 515 we agree that the judgment in that case does support this contention but we do not consider that reading these words into the ..... or money legally recoverable by him from the plaintiff the written statement shall have the same effect as a plaint in a cross suit so as to enable the court to .....

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Rao Bahadur Ravula Subba Rao and an ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1946)1MLJ332

of income tax under section 66 i to state a case to this court the appellate tribunal has referred the following

P. Kuttiali and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1946)1MLJ286

are residents of kallai and it is not the prosecution case that they are trading in a rationed area therefore from

Subbiah Pillai Vs. Muthathal Achi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1946Mad457; (1946)1MLJ308

under mortgages not valid in law this is not a case where the plaintiff seeks to redeem a mortgage and being