Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1999 Page 1 of about 602 results (0.202 seconds)
Jun 15 1999 (HC)

Madurai City Co-operative Housing Society Limited, No. A-2582, Represe ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-15-1999

Reported in: 1999(2)CTC407

section 90 of the said act further in an identical case subramani j in a decision reported in m d a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 09 1999 (HC)

S. Udayakumar Vs. the Special Tribunal for Co-operative Cases, Madurai ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-09-1999

Reported in: 1999(2)CTC618; (1999)3MLJ138

..... is not explained it could be seen from this government order that the same is imposed as penalty if it is a case of penalty is not petitioner entitled to be heard before awarding that ..... as per statute he is entitled only to decide those cases where the monitory liability is rs 10 000 and below even though the same has been enhanced subsequently to rs 50 000 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 23 1999 (HC)

Referring Officer Vs. Sc 1/96 to 32/95 (Annexure-i) Cc No. 1/96 and 59 ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-23-1999

Reported in: 1999(3)ALD544; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)818; 1999CriLJ4173

..... 1998 and the senior counsel sri b tarakam appearing for impleaded respondent complainant in the same case as the points raised therein are overlapping 7 first we will refer to the relevant ..... various offences separately charged committed in the course of the same transaction subsection 3 of section 220 of the code covers cases where particular act constituting offence falling within two or more .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1999 (TRI)

Kantilal M. Bhuva and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Customs (P)

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-03-1999

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC610

this submission unconditional stay and waiver was granted in his case 2 shri lalji m bhuva was directed to deposit a

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1999 (TRI)

Hira Cement Vs. Collr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-05-1999

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC275

referred to the decision of the supreme court in the case of snow white industrial corporation v cce reported in 1989

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 1999 (TRI)

Guru Electro Cables Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-04-1999

Reported in: (2001)(130)ELT956Tri(Chennai)

..... procedural violation and the credit ought to have been granted the appellants have requested the case to be decided on merits 3 we have heard ld dr mrs aruna gupta in ..... for production of relevant documents there is no merit in the appeal and hence the same is rejected

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 1999 (TRI)

Autoline Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Aug-04-1999

Reported in: (1999)(66)ECC787

we have carefully considered the submissions and records of the case including the grounds of appeal we find that as far

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 05 1999 (TRI)

Ramuka and Bhageria Cement Pvt. Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-05-1999

Reported in: (2000)LC135Tri(Delhi)

judgment on this issue by the tribunal is in the case of dukart and company p limited v collector reported in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 04 1999 (TRI)

C.C.E. Vs. Rajendra Mechanical Indus. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Aug-04-1999

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC138

..... seen in this context there was no extended period of limitation involved and in any case the range superintendent was not competent during the year 1990 to invoke extended period of ..... appeals and there is no merit in this appeal filed by the revenue and the same is rejected

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 03 1999 (TRI)

Shalimar International Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-03-1999

Reported in: (2000)(67)ECC612

main appeal can be verified only on perusal of the case file dr is advised to secure the file and inform

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //