Did you mean: bye laws?

Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1933 Page 1 of about 1,675 results (0.184 seconds)

Apr 10 1933 (PC)

Kodoth Ambu Nair Vs. Echikan Cherekere Kelu Nair

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-10-1933

Reported in: (1933)35BOMLR807

..... process of execution possession of the property and to retain the same as usufructuary mortgagee the mortgagors having the right to redeem in ..... is objected for the appellant that this view of the case is not admissible inasmuch as no estoppel was pleaded and no ..... process of execution possession of the property and to retain the same as usufructuary mortgagee the mortgagor having the right to redeem in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 1933 (PC)

Muhammad Sheriff Sahib Vs. Sayyed Kasim Saheb and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-24-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Mad635; 145Ind.Cas.230

alleged real owner s heir has given evidence in this case from which it can be inferred that she is not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 1933 (PC)

Kabil Gazi Vs. Madari Bibi

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-09-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal630,145Ind.Cas.828

hearing the learned advocates appearing for the parties in this case it appears to me that leave should be granted to

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 01 1933 (PC)

Abdul Khaleque Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-01-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal606

..... set aside and we direct that the accused be retried he may remain on the same bail as before subject to any order of the sessions judge ameer ali j 3 ..... rankin c j 1 in my opinion this appeal succeeds the case was that the accused caught hold of and committed rape on a girl who according .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1933 (PC)

Assam Bengal Ry. Co., Ltd. Vs. Hari Mohun Pal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-13-1933

Reported in: AIR1933Cal440

be referred to for a collateral purpose the defendant s case before us is that they were not holding under the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 15 1933 (PC)

Srinivasa Ayyar Alias Srinivasa Ayyangar Vs. the Board of Commissioner ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-15-1933

Reported in: 148Ind.Cas.168

appeal would lie against such an order only in a case open to appeal 2 we therefore hold that the civil

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 1933 (PC)

Gollapudi Venkatachalapathi Rao Vs. Adusumilli Gopalakrishnayya

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-01-1933

Reported in: 147Ind.Cas.756

..... due in successive years to the same landholder from the same mokhasadar upon portions of the same mokhasa but when regard is had ..... plain that that the annual kattubadi cannot possibly be the same in successive years and can only be ascertained each year ..... a case of different causes of action arising from the same transaction or relation between the same parties and not suits upon the same cause .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1933 (PC)