Skip to content

Did you mean: bye laws?


Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1928 Page 1 of about 1,690 results (0.17 seconds)
Jan 23 1928 (PC)

Bhagwati Vs. Banarsi Das

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-23-1928

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR834

statutory obligation was negatived in the particular circumstances of this case by reason of the terms of the contract of sale

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 1928 (PC)

In Re: M. Viswanadha Rao and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-27-1928

Reported in: 112Ind.Cas.863

life or to the security of property but in the case assumed creates an excitement which endangers both the position could

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1928 (PC)

Bhabesh Chandra Banerjee and ors. Vs. Shyama Sundari Debi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-04-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Cal399,108Ind.Cas.255

application under section 105 in the circumstances obtaining in this case therefore the issue as to the amount of rent payable

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 1928 (PC)

Narayan Chandra Borah Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-08-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Cal324

assumption against the petitioner the more so as the positive case of short weight that was made against the petitioner has

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1928 (PC)

Chhatto Lal Misser and Co. Vs. Naraindas Baijnath Prasad

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Sep-04-1928

Reported in: AIR1930Cal53

..... wards act 1912 and that this court is not competent to hear a case against him or to decree it unless the provisions of that act ..... territories as far as this court is concerned the act is in the same position as the legislation of a foreign country and though such legislation ..... i r 1926 cal 271 buckland j appears to have adopted the same view i do not think the observations of the then chief justice .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 1928 (PC)

Shaik MoidIn Vs. Kunhadevi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-29-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad33; 126Ind.Cas.111

the interest of the child as being paramount in this case there is nothing to show that the father is in

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 05 1928 (PC)

In Re: a Veluayudam Pillai and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-05-1928

Reported in: 115Ind.Cas.509

orderreilly j 1 the only evidence in this case that ex c 4 is a false document is ex

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 27 1928 (PC)

Palepu Narayanamurthy Vs. Mallapudi Subrahmanyam

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-27-1928

Reported in: 114Ind.Cas.655

the plaintiff that that partner sip was illegal but the cases relied on marudamuthu pillai v rangasarni moopan 24 m 401

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 1928 (PC)

Rampalli Ramachandrudu Vs. Karri Krishna Reddi

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-12-1928

Reported in: 115Ind.Cas.829

consideration apart from saying it is a nominal transaction which case has not been suggested 2 the assignment ought to have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1928 (PC)

Vemulapalli Krishnayya and anr. Vs. Katragadda Ramayya and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-16-1928

Reported in: 110Ind.Cas.310

by the guardian ad litem reliance is placed on a case of narasimha ran v lakshmipati rau 1 in which it

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //