Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Singa Marak and ors. Vs. King Emperor

Court: Guwahati

relatives have a joint interest in the property in this case it has been reported that the applicants have no joint

In Re: Manickam

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad576

of law is not necessary in such circumstances of the case while there fore confirming the conviction under section 302 penal

Balasubramanian Chettiar Vs. Al. Vr. St. Veerappa Chettiar and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad783; (1950)IIMLJ206

had not been considered by this court in any decided cases the legislation being of very recent origin he in dismissing

Kuppuswami Reddi and anr. Vs. Pavanambal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad728

all 426 a i r 1935 all 37 in this case all that is alleged by the respondent is that the

In Re: A.R. Krishnaswami Chettiar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad713

..... excused p w 1 thereupon prepared a statement and asked the brother to sign the same when the latter was about to sign it the accused came in and prevented him ..... him at that time 3 the defence is one of total denial and that the case was falsely foisted on the accused on account of enmity the accused examined witnesses in .....

In Re: K. Sundaresa Aiyar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1950Mad657

..... and company which was the managing agent of the hind commonwealth corporation ltd kumbakonam the case against him was under s 282 a companies act in that he wrongfully kept possession ..... he obtained a decree for the amount claimed with costs making the same a first charge on the very same movable items which the petitioner is alleged to have wrongfully retained in .....

Parvathi Ammal Vs. Meenakshi Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad841; (1951)IMLJ446

..... civil reyn petn is allowed but in the circumstances of this case there will be no order as to costs either here ..... court plaint amended conferring pecuniary jurisdiction on court and represented to same court by advocate of plaintiff representation of plaint cannot be ..... old plaint had been amended in many respects presented to the same ct which had previouslyreturned the plaint as unamended i am .....

P. Venkateswara Rao Vs. K. Satyanarayana and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1951Mad774; (1951)IMLJ234

in a temple or other religious institution there is no case that these pictures were either installed in a temple or

T. Venkateswara Rao Vs. Masulipatam Municipal Council by Commissioner ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1952Mad608; (1951)IMLJ453

functions to such committees what the municipal council in this case did was to constitute committees and to delegate some of

Valia Peetikayil Chandrankandi Kunhi Pathumma Vs. Ariyoth Ayammad and ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1951)1MLJ100

instalments on 15th march and 15th september in the present case there is no difficulty at all because the matter was