Same Case - Judgment Search Results

ElgIn National Watch Co. Vs. Illinois Watch Case Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... defendants from directly or indirectly making or selling any watch case or watch cases marked with your orator s said trademark and from ..... labels or the boxes or packages in which their said watch cases are put or exposed for sale a demurrer having been ..... of substantially the same descriptive properties as those described in the registration shall be liable to an action on the case for damages for .....

Kanthu Punja Vs. Vittamma and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1902)ILR25Mad385

settled but in the view which we take of the case it is immaterial upon whom it was really settled or

Kalai Haldar Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

..... behaviour for the term of one year or in default to undergo imprisonment for the same period the charge which they were called upon to meet under that section is stated ..... safe to act upon 5 having regard to the nature of the evidence in this case we are of opinion that the order against the two petitioners cannot be sustained we .....

Ashutosh Nath Ray Vs. Abdool

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1901)ILR28Cal676

1 the facts of this case are that there was a settlement of the plaintiff s

E.J. Rooke Vs. Bengal Coal Company, Ld.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1901)ILR28Cal485

in various decisions of this court see amongst others the case of raniganj coal association v judoo nath ghose 1892 i

In Re: Rudra NaraIn Roy

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1901)ILR28Cal479

at the examination for mukhtearship the board then investigated his case and exercising no doubt a wise and proper discretion came

Jagomohan Pal Vs. Ram Kumar Gope

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1901)ILR28Cal416

judge power to call for the record in such a case or to advise us how we are to exercise our

Venkataratnam Naidu and anr. Vs. Ramaraju and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1901)ILR24Mad361

to deduct under section 14 of the limitation act this case being analogous to that decided in assan v pathumma i

Ameer Ammal Vs. Sankaranarayanan Chetty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1902)ILR25Mad658

mussamut shubrathen 6 beng l r 54 in the present case the widow has no doubt been in possession since the

Lakshminarasayya Setti Vs. Venkanna Setti and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1902)ILR25Mad576

..... the correct interpretation to be put upon the expression notice of the same i e notice of the rehearing or appeal which occurs in the ..... inclined to think that it is there were reasonable grounds in this case for the extension of the three weeks prescribed by the latter ..... prescribed by the section for giving notice of the appeal whether the same has been filed or is only intended to be filed remains .....