Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Five Percent Discount Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

five percent discount cases 243 u s 97 1917 u s supreme court five

Raja Jatindra Mohan Ray Vs. Raja Ramesh Chandra Ray and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 40Ind.Cas.504

..... permitting the plaintiffs to the joint possession the parties belog to the same family and they occupy a homrstead of 60 lighas parts of which ..... that the learned judge thought is that this is not an ordinary case of a large portion of ijmali land of which either party would ..... doubt that the position of the defendant no 1 would be the same as it was before he approached this gentleman who gave the money .....

Sakhayat Ali Munshi and ors. Vs. Alhadi Hazi and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 43Ind.Cas.332

well founded is apparent from the order sheet of the case and also from the ill advised explanation which the sub

Sultan Ahmad Vs. Srimati Safra Khatun

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 43Ind.Cas.17

some of the terms of the kabinnamah being that in case of quarrel between the wife and the members of the

Sarip Hochan Vs. Tilattama Debi, Wife of Janaki Nath Mukhopadhya

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 43Ind.Cas.3

fletcher j 1 this is a case that admits of no doubt the suit was brought by

Bagha Mowar and ors. Vs. Ram Lakhan Misshra and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 41Ind.Cas.804

..... karmokhr 35 c 1010 8 c l j 90 12 c w n 854 these cases show that a document which embodies a contract for variation of the rent payable in ..... is in fact incorrect but there is no reason why he should not achieve the same result by proof that the material whereon the settlement officer based his decision does not .....

Behari Lal Biswas Vs. Nasimannessa Bibi

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 41Ind.Cas.694

..... add payments on account of the patni rent to the debt was made in the case of lala bharub chandra karpur v lalit mohun singh 1 12 0 185 6 jnd ..... that that section has given a new power to the mortgagee in possession and the same view of section 13 of the patni regulation was taken in ramjiban v taj ud .....

Surendra Nath Goswamy and ors. Vs. Rajani Kanta Das

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 41Ind.Cas.446

that that proviso can have no application in certain particular cases where the court has become possessed of the money in

Ram Prosad Pramanik and anr. Vs. Sricharan Mandal

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 41Ind.Cas.276

wrongfully cut and for crops misappropriated by the defendant the case for the plaintiff was that the land in dispute was

Amulya Chandra Roy Chowdhury Vs. Shiva Krishna Bose and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 40Ind.Cas.768

rent in proper time it seems that there is no case of hardship against the defendant appellant at all he has