Same Case - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Anand Health Case Ltd. Vs. Cc New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1 the present rua application for the restoration of the appeal which was dismissed for non compliance with the stay...

Workmen of Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd. Specialised Watch Case Divisio ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2001(89)FLR452]; ILR2001KAR1502; (2001)ILLJ1449Kant

..... to as the act petitioner is representing the workers of hmt specialised watch case division manufacturing specialised watch cases this unit was started in 1983 it is alleged that bonus was not ..... an establishment consists of different departments or undertakings or has branches whether situated in the same place or in different places all such departments or undertakings or branches shall be treated .....

Md. Naim and ors. Vs. C.C.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2001)(77)ECC142

..... verification found the subject goods of the third country origin the same were seized alongwith the aforementioned truck valued rs 4 00 000 ..... the contents he further observed that from the circumstances of the case it is clearly established that the driver was fully aware about ..... impose penalty on the driver shri md masroor hussain on the same logic it must be held that the order of confiscation of .....

M/S. Alwar Processors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... application for waiver of duty amounting to rs 4 48 238 and penalty of the same amount under sec 11ac 3 ld counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants submits that ..... of rs 1 58 827 taking in to consideration the facts and circumstances of the case the applicants are directed to deposit the remaining amount of duty i e 8 411 .....

Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai Vs. Bellary Steel and Alloys Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

departmental representative does not dispute that the facts of the case before us will be covered by the amnesty scheme

Tas Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(131)ELT275Tri(Mum.)bai

section 11b of the act would be con fined to cases where excess payment of duty is made purely only by

Deepak Fertilizers and Petro Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(75)ECC817

we are prima facie satisfied that the applicant has a case on limitation we therefore waive deposit of the duty demanded

General Motors India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2001)(78)ECC423

the manufacturer 5 this reasoning will squarely apply in those cases where the goods are sold by general motors to the

Paras Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise and

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

the bona fide belief that the goods were exempted its case would be covered by various decisions of the tribunal which

M/S. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise,

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... in the impugned order the commissioner appeals held as under i have gone through the case record and i find that the basic question remains unanswered by the appellant namely registration ..... the udaipur office was registered as registration of dealer was an essential condition and the same has not been complied with i hold that the impugned order has correctly been passed .....