Same Case - Judgment Search Results

Reserve Bank of India Vs. Appellate Authority for Nbfc Registration Ca ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: IV(2005)BC435; [2006]130CompCas304(Delhi); (2006)2CompLJ235(Del)

..... commission to of the first installment but they do not have same enthusiasm in respect of deposit of subsequent installments in these ..... by a consideration of these very factors alone in those rare cases where subsequent events have transpired which appear to have a ..... decision the appellate authority may consider it appropriateto remand the case for fresh consideration however it has not done so it .....

Gaurav Abduction Case Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

to curb and control undesired and illegal activities in such cases director general of police to comply and put up suggestions

Shalimar Paper Mills (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)STR22

of finance act 1994 by the supreme court in the case of laghu udyog bharati v union of india however the

Parimala Subramanian Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT242Tri(Chennai)

the writ petition filed by the mandap keepers association the case was ultimately decided by the court in favour of the

Cce Vs. Super Cassettes Indus. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

are the moulds for metal other than ingot moulds in case the moulds are covered by heading 84 80 of the

Roots Industries Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT379Tri(Chennai)

..... rendered by the appellants viz calibration of measuring instrument was a tangible service and the same did not attract the definition of consulting engineer or engineering consultancy service moreover it ..... was not the department s case that the calibration of instrument was done by engineers the findings and observations made .....

Mseb Pole Factory Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT209Tri(Mum.)bai

..... the date when the amount is determined in the present case the amount of duty was determined against the appellant on ..... appellant have submitted that another appeal on identical point against the same impugned order was subsequently filed by them with condonation of ..... the purpose of present appeal their assessment was provisional the same was finalised by proper officer vide his impugned order in .....

Prakash B. Bagrecha Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT214Tri(Mum.)bai

therefore sustainable however in the facts and circumstances of the case we reduce the penalty to rs 1 00 000

Super Steel Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT212Tri(Mum.)bai

light of the above we hold that a prima facie case for waiver has been made out waive the requirement of

C.M. JaIn and Company Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

however taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case i am of the view that the penalty of rs