Same Case - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: same case Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 4,829 results (0.243 seconds)Agfa Gevaert India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-09-1983
Reported in: (1983)LC270DTri(Mum.)bai
..... for professional photographers even in the past the import of the same book had not been treated as prohibited on the grounds of ..... customs house i refrain from going into the merits of the case since the evidence has been destroyed i allow the appeal on ..... the appellant s representative emphasised that an identical consignment of the same book had been released by the customs house and in support .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTY.V. Rangaiah and ors. Vs. J. Sreenivasa Rao and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-24-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC852; (1983)IILLJ23SC; 1983(1)SCALE296; (1983)3SCC284
..... made by the appointing authority or the authority specified in sub rule c as the case may be from a list of the approved candidates the rule further provides that such ..... the sub registrars from time to time but he was not obliged to prepare the same annually 2 that the delay in the preparation of the panel as on 1st september .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDistrict Magistrate, Nowgong and anr. Vs. Sarat Mudoi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-14-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC43; 1983CriLJ1728; 1983(2)SCALE302; (1984)1SCC25; [1983]3SCR957
..... services specified in the order of detention it is bad in a k roy s case and the connected matters this court took the view that no person could be detained ..... and this notification was duly published in the gazette of india extraordinary issue of the same day under the act the detenu is entitled to make a representation against the order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTN.M. Abraham Vs. State of Kerala
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-02-1983
Reported in: 1983(1)SCALE112; 1984Supp(1)SCC647
regard to the very peculiar facts and circumstances of this case while upholding the conviction of the appellants we reduce the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSital Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-05-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC652; 1983CriLJ1042; 1983(1)Crimes1011(SC); 1983(1)SCALE319; (1983)3SCC266
evidence for supporting his submission that this is not a case where charge of murder can be sustained on the material
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBritish India Corporation Ltd. Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Punjab and ors ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-24-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC362; 1984LabIC14; (1984)ILLJ1SC; 1983(2)SCALE390; (1984)1SCC305; 1984(1)SLJ180(SC)
and there fore even if on merits there is no case to interfere with the award of the tribunal looking to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of U.P. Vs. District Judge,
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-06-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC1401; 1983(2)SCALE1035; (1984)2SCC673
no fault of theirs though in the facts of the case they ought not to have very seriously contested the application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Jagadeesan Vs. Ayya Nadar Janaki Ammal College and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-11-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC1512; 1983LabIC867; (1983)IILLJ190SC; 1983(1)SCALE721; (1984)1SCC158
decision of this court in all saints high school s case supra our attention is drawn to the observations of kailasam
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeputy Commissioner of Sales Tax (Law), Board of Revenue (Taxes), Erna ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-09-1983
Reported in: AIR1983SC493; 1983(0)KLT289(SC); 1983(1)SCALE102; (1983)2SCC79
appeals hence these appeals 3 the question involved in these cases is covered by the decision of this court in deputy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSupdt. of Police, Manipur and ors. Vs. R.K. Tomalsana Singh (Dead) by ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-17-1983
Reported in: AIR1984SC535; [1984(49)FLR215]; 1984LabIC295; (1984)ILLJ211SC; 1983(2)SCALE916; 1984Supp(1)SCC155
continued in service further looking to the circumstances of the case we also direct that the appellant shall pay the costs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial