Court : Delhi
$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 12.2019 RC.REV. 654/2019 & CM APPL. 52292/2019, CM APPL. 51814-15/2019 GULFAM versus MOHD BILAL & ANR ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner: Mr. A. Maitri, Advocate For the Respondent: None. CORAM:-"HONBLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.(ORAL) CM APP No.49776/2018 For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. The Revision Petition is taken up for consideration today itself. The next date i.e. 11.12.2019 is cancelled. RC.REV. 654/2019 1.... Petitioner impugns order dated 07.05.2019, whereby eviction petition filed by the respondent has been allowed under Section 14(1) (e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 on the ground of bonafide RC.REV.654/2019 Page 1 of 7 necessity.2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~A-16 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 89/2019 & I.A. 14559/2019 M/S TECHNO POWER ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshuman Sharma and Mr. Vishesh Dhundia, Advocates versus NATIONAL COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES LTD. (NCML) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Dhaval Mehrotra and Mr. Sudhanshu Sikka, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) 1. An Arbitration Agreement dated 20.04.2014 was entered into between the parties which reads as under:-"38. Arbitration (a) In the event of any dispute or controversy between the Parties to this agreement in connection with the rights and obligation hereunder, the parties shall first endeavour to co- operate to resolve the dispute or controversy by mutual consultation and agreement. (b) In the event that the dispute or event is not resolved by mutual consultation, the same shall be referred of Arbitration. Both parties shall agree for...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~50 & 51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + + CM (M) 1725/2019 CM (M) 1726/2019 RAM DHARI JINDAL MEMORIAL TRUST (REGD) ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, Mr. Saurabh Tiwari and Ms. Tejaswini, Advocates. (M:9810064790) versus NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel for North DMC. (M:9212504099) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) CM APPL. 52111/2019 (exemption) in CM (M) 1725/2019 CM APPL. 52113/2019 (exemption) in CM (M) 1726/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Applications are disposed of. CM (M) 1725/2019 & CM APPL. 52110/2019 (direction) CM (M) 1726/2019 & CM APPL. 52112/2019 (direction) 2. The present petitions have been filed by the... Petitioner - Ram Dhari Jindal Memorial Trust (Regd.), which is running the Jindal International School on its land at Village Shahbad Daulatpur, Sector-28, Rohini, Delhi. The case of the... Petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 371/2019 VIKAS JHA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Vikas Padora and Mr. Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advs. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with W/SI Renu and W/SI Radha, PS Delhi Cantt. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.113/2018 registered at Police Station Delhi Cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. Notice issued.3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C.391/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ASIF STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Shashank Vats, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41774/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at Police Station Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C.6193/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~59 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 NIKHIL SINGH & ORS. Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Mohammad Sajid, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghei, APP for State with W/SI Sushma, PS Uttam Nagar Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41782/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.369/2016 dated 08.04.2016 registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, New Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6196/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 11.06.2015...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~63 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:04. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 SUNIL VERMA Through: Mr. Ravi Chawla and Mr. Avi Kalra, ........ Petitioner versus Advs. STATE & ORS Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS with SI Pawan, PS - EOW CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41601/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby directing the learned Metropolitan Magistrate for early disposal of application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. or in alternative, direct the concerned SHO, EOW, New Delhi to lodge an FIR against the respondent Nos.2 & 3 as per the provisions of law. CRL.M.C. 6157/2019 Page 1 of 4 4. The case of the petitioner is that learned Trial Court has been sitting on the file since the past 160 days, as the case is pending orders on the application under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + CM (M) 856/2016 & CM APPL. 31978/2016 ROSHAN LAL Through: Mr. P. S. Sharda and Mr. Kshitij ........ Petitioner versus Sharda, Advocates. (M:9810077120) RAM NATH GARG ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Runjita Das and Mr. Vishal Mehar, Advocates. (M:9953738402) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 29th July, 2016 by which three applications, filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff), have been disposed of by the Ld. Civil Judge. The main contest is in respect of the application seeking appointment of a Local Commissioner and the application for leading additional evidence.2. The dispute arises out of a suit for possession filed by the Plaintiff Shri Ram Nath Garg. The case of the Plaintiff is that he is the owner of the property bearing no.4/47, forming part of property No.605, area measuring...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 6692/2014 SR. DIVISIONAL MANAGER, LIC OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Soumyajit Pani, Mr. Chittaranjan Singh, Advocates versus RENUKA SHARMA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Inder Jit Singh, Advocate along with respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the award of the Industrial Tribunal 1. whereby the Industrial Tribunal set aside the penalty of removal from service of the respondent and imposed penalty of reduction of three stages of basic pay of time scale in lieu of penalty for removal from service.2. The respondent was working with the petitioner as an Assistant with effect from 01st March, 1994. On 25th March, 2008, the respondent applied for and was granted leave for 35 days from 11th April, 2008 to 15th May, 2008 for going to Singapore on the ground that her husband had been deputed in a job in Singapore. On expiry of th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:04. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 9843/2018 NITYA NAND SINHA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Bankey Bihari, Mr. Birendra Bikram, Advocates with petitioner in person. versus M/S HL PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR Through: Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, Senior ........ RESPONDENTS Advocate with Mr. Saifur R. Faridi and Ms. Cassandra Zosangliani, Advocates for R1. Ms. Barnali Basak, Advocate for R2/GNCTD. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT The petitioner has challenged the order dated 31st May, 2018 whereby 1. the learned Labour Court rejected the statement of claim of the petitioner.2. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute against the respondents on the averments that he was in the permanent and continuous employment of the respondent since 01st December, 2014; he was designated as a General Manager but he never performed managerial, supervisory and administrative nature of duties during his tenure; the primary, basi...
Tag this Judgment!