Court : Delhi
$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:5. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1202/2019 LAXMI DEVI ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonali Malhotra, Advocate (M:98180. 4129). versus SURESH MENDIRATTA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Anuj Gupta and Mr. Pinki Aggarwal, Advocates along with Respondent person. (M:9999936866) in CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) REVIEW PET. 473/2019 & CM APPL. 49623/2019 1. Ld. Counsel for the Respondent submits that there is no challenge filed by his client against the earlier orders passed by this Court on 30th October, 2019 and 5th August, 2019.2. The present review petition seeks a review of order dated 30th October, 2019, by which this Court, after hearing the ld. counsels for the parties had directed that the DNA test would be required, to establish as to whether Mr. Suresh Mendiratta @Suresh Chander Mendiratta is the son of Smt. Laxmi Devi or Smt. Geeta Devi. On the said date, the Court had also fixed the date and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI AVTAR SINGH ARORA Reserved on:25. h November, 2019 Decided on:4. h December, 2019 W.P.(C) 13147/2018 .Petitioner Through: Mr. M.K. Bhardwaj, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ...... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj and Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, who is an Additional Director General (Electrical & Mechanical) [ADG (E&M)]. in the Central Public Works Department (CPWD), has filed the present petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 22nd November, 2018 in OA No.2350/ 2018, filed by the... Petitioner. Respondent No.1 is the Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs, Respondent No.2 is the W.P.(C) 13147/2018 Page 1 of 18 Director General, Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs and Respondent No.3 is the Union Public Services Commission (UPSC).2. By the abo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:4th December, 2019 W.P. (C) 12059/2019 + ASHOK KUMAR CHAUDHARY & ORS. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. versus Through: Mr. Anand Nandan, Advocate. ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Talwant Singh, J.CM APPL. 46679/2018 (exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 12059/2019 2. The... Petitioners have challenged an order dated 16th July, 2018 passed in OA No.362/2015 by Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) Principal Bench, New Delhi by which their original application was disposed of by passing the following order: 6. In the circumstances and for the aforesaid reasons, the OA is disposed of by permitting the applicants to submit an appropriate representative for leave benefits and bonus, and on receipt of such a representation from the applicants, the W.P. (C) 12...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:31. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 2024/2018& Crl. M.A. 7164/2018, 7786/2018, 7787/2018 & 28577/2018 SHUBHAM BANSAL Through Mr.S.C. Buttan, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus THE STATE ( GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr.K.K. Ghei, APP for State. SI Sandeep Crime Branch R.K. Puram. Mr. J.M. Kalia, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside the observations of the learned Court passed in application under section 173(8) Cr.P.C. in FIR No.130/2012 in case titled State vs. Shubham Kansal.2. Further seeks direction thereby setting aside order dated 04.01.2017 passed in Criminal Revision No.138/2016 and restore order dated CRL.M.C.2024/2018 Page 1 of 16 26.02.2016 passed by learned CMM whereby proceedings under Section 66A, IT Act and Section 509 IPC against the petitioner h...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Reserved on:23. 10.2019 Pronounced on:04. 12.2019 KARTAR SINGH & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr.Mahipal Singh Drall, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.K.K. Ghai, APP for State. Insp.Sunil Kumar, SHO/Alipur. Mr.Atul Guleria, Adv. with Mr.Gautam Mann, Adv. for R-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to set aside/quash impugned order dated 06.02.2019 passed by learned ASJ, (North) District Courts, Rohini Courts Delhi in the interest of justice and equity.2. Brief facts of the case are that in the intervening night of 29/30.08.2018 at about 1:00 AM, petitioner No.l was informed by Mr. Vikas, friend of Mr. Ashish Kumar s/o petitioner No.l, that Ashish Kumar CRL.M.C. 4192/2019 Page 1 of 21 has been arrested by the local police and taken to Police Station, Alipur, Delhi.... Petition...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~7 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4330/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 SHRI MAHAVIR & ANR. ........ Petitioners Through Mr.S.A. Rajput, Adv. versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS ASI Pushpender Pal Singh DIU/West Distt. Respondent no.2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 34755/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4330/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.404/2012 dated 21.09.2012, registered at Police Station Uttam Nagar, for the offences punishable under Sections 452/323/5IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.4330/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is file...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~64 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar and Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma, Advs. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS versus Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/ Malviya Nagar and SI Deepak Tanwar, PS Malviya Nagar R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41827/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 and CRL.M.A. 41826/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.6. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3869/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 RAJNI GUPTA @ RAJNEE & ANR ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Anoop Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Vikas Saini, Mr.Manish Malik, Mr.Dinesh Madeshiya & Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Sanjeev Kumar PS Gandhi Nagar. Respondent nos.2&3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.363/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent nos.2 2.3. & 3. CRL.M.C.3869/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~4 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3870/2019 Date of decision:04. 12.2019 ASHWANI SHARMA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Anoop Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Vikas Saini, Mr.Manish Malik, Mr.Dinesh Madeshiya & Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Pravesh Kumar PS Vivek Vihar. Respondent nos.2 & 3 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.362/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for State and respondent nos.2 & 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C.3870/2019 Page 1 of 2 5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the part...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:22. d November, 2019 Judgment pronounced on:4. December, 2019 FAO(OS) (COMM) 293/2018 M/S SHRIRAM DISTRIBUTION SERVICES PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through Mr. Ashish Bhagat, Mr. Tanmeet Singh &Mr. Ritik Malik, Advocates versus M/S A N TRADERS PVT LTD ..... Respondent Through Mr. Ashim Vachher & Mr. Vaibhav Dabas, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH G.S. SISTANI, J.1. The present appeal, filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 (hereinafter the Act) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015, is directed against the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by a learned Single Judge of this Court in O.M.P. (COMM) 169/2018, by which the learned Single Judge has set aside the arbitral award dated 11.01.2018.2. Brief facts required to be considered for disposal of this appeal are th...
Tag this Judgment!