Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 237 of 2017 with I.A No.1192 of 2017 (Against the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and Order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-I, Gumla, in S.T No.289 of 2009.) Bharat Kansari ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Respondent -------- CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE B. B. MANGALMURTI ------ For the Appellant : Mr. Md. Zaid Ahmed For the State : A.P.P. ------ By Court:- Though this case is listed for consideration of the interlocutory application filed by the appellant for bail, but upon going through the record, we find that the entire appeal can be disposed of at this stage itself, which is being done accordingly.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and the learned counsel for the State.3. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction dated 16.03.2013 and Order of sentence dated 19.03.2013, passed by the learned Add...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(C)No.7318of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7319of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7320of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7321of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7322of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7323of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7324of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......Respondents with W.P.(C)No.7325of2017 M/sHindalcoIndustriesLimited ......Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhandandothers ......
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7286 of 2017 --- M/s Hindalco Industries Limited .... ...... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. .... ...... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Ganguly, Sr. Adv. Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Adv. Mr. Ashish Prasad, Adv. Ms. Mukta Dutta, Adv. Mr. Vijay Kant Dubey, Adv. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.G. Mr. H.K. Mehta, A.A.G. Mr. Atanu Banerjee, G.A. Mr. Chanchal Jain, JC to A.G. Ms. Aprajita Bhardwaj, J.C to A.G. --- 05/12.01.2018 I.A. No. 231 of 2018 A strange application has been filed. Seeking exemption from filing compliance report in terms of order dated 04.01.2018 passed in W.P.(C) No. 7286 of 2017, the respondents have filed this application.2. The learned Advocate-General submits that under the High Court Rules period of limitation for filing appeal against an order passed by the Single Judge of this Court is 30 days and an appeal vide L.P.A. No. 10...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (D.B.) No. 90 of 1993 (R) (Against the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 17th of February, 1993, passed by the Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, holding Circuit Court at Lohardaga, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1992). ------------- Nawin Sahu @ Nagendra Prasad Sahu .. Appellant Versus The State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) .. Respondent -------- For the Appellant : Mr. Ashish Verma, Advocate. For the Respondent-State : Mr. Ram Prakash Singh, A.P.P. -------- PRESENT : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH PRASAD DEO ------- By Court.:- Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.2. The appellant is aggrieved by the Judgment of conviction and Order of sentence dated 17th of February, 1993, passed by the learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, holding Circuit Court at Lohardaga, in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1992, whereby, the sole accused has been found guilty and convicte...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 719 of 2006 .. Diwakar Mahato ... Petitioner -V e r s u s- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Chhutu Ram Mahato 3. Ruitu Mahto 4. Majhila Mahato 5. Gurucharan Mahato 6. Bishnu Charan Mahato ...Opp. Parties CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : - None For the Opp. Parties :- None. 04/11.01.2018 No one appears for the petitioner or the opposite parties.2. We have perused the impugned judgment and materials available on record. This revision petition is preferred against the judgment of acquittal dated 08th August, 2006 passed in Sessions Trial No. 20 of 2004, by the court of Learned Sessions Judge, Seraikela-Kharsawan, whereunder accused/opposite parties have been acquitted of the charges for the offence under Section 436 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.3. As per the case of the complainant, the incident is of 27.05.1998 in the evening when on return from the local ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No.3758 of 2011 Deep Shikha Kumari, Daughter of Ravindra Narayan Upadhay, Resident of Village West Bokaro Ghato Tand, Quarters No.C-16, P.O. Ghato, P.S. Mandu & District Ramgarh. .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Chief Secretary of Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. Project Bhawan, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District- Ranchi, Jharkhand.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi, P.O. Project Bhawan, P.S. Jagarnathpur & District-Ranchi, Jharkhand.3. Mrs. Aradhana Patnayak, I.A.S., Mission Director, National Rural Health Mission Committee, Namkum, Ranchi, Jharkhand.4. The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. & Sub-Divisional & District Dumka.5. Civil Surgeon, Dumka P.O.& P.S. & Sub-Divisional & District Dumka. ....... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr. Sarju Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. An...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 With W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 In W.P. (C) No. 2176 of 2015) & (In W.P. (C) No. 2184 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Ramgarh.6. District Mining Officer, Ramgarh. Respondents In W.P. (C) No. 2185 of 2015 Tata Steel Limited. Petitioner Versus 1. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Coal, New Delhi.2. The Secretary, Ministry of Mines, Government of India, New Delhi.3. The State of Jharkhand, Through the Chief Secretary, Ranchi.4. The Secretary, Department of Mines & Geology, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi.5. Assistant Mining Officer, Dhanbad.6. Distri...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1723 of 2008 ------- 1.Santra Gope, W/o Sri Ramdas Gope, Resident of Village-Bankati, P.O-Tikar, P.S.-Ichagarh, District-Saraikella-Kharswan. 2.Revati Gope, W/o Sri Madhusudan Gope, Resident of Village-Bankati, P.O-Tikar, P.S.-Ichagarh, District-Saraikella-Kharswan. ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand; 2.The Deputy Commissioner, Saraikella-Kharswan at Seraikella; 3.The Deputy Development Commissioner, Saraikella-Kharswan at Seraikella; 4.The Child Development Project Officer, Ichagarh, P.O & P.S- Ichagarh, Saraikella-Kharswan; 5.The District Programme Officer, Seraikella; 6.Shrimati Sunita Gorai, Wife of Sri Anant Lal Gorai, Presently residing at Village & P.O tikar, P.S. Ichagarh, Saraikella-Kharswan; 7.Sulekha Gope, Wife of Sri Dinesh Chandra Gope, Presently residing at Village & P.O tikar, P.S. Ichagarh, Saraikella-Kharswan; .... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK ------ For the Petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 3804 of 2012 Shubh Chandra Jha, Son of Sri Satya Narayan Jha, Resident of Village- Mahuar, P.O. & P.S.-Ghanshyampur, District-Darbhanga. .... Petitioner Versus 1. M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, through its Chairman-cum-Managing Director, having its office at Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O.-Koyla Nagar, P.S.-Saraidhela, District-Dhanbad.2. General Manager (P & IR) Bharat Coking Coal Limited, having its office at Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O.-Koyla Nagar, P.S.-Saraidhela, District- Dhanbad.3. Area Personal Manager, Sijua Area, B.C.C.L., P.O. & P.S. Sijua, District- Dhanbad.4. Project Officer, New Akash Kinaree Colliery, B.C.C.L. P.O. Katras Bazar, P.S. Katras, District-Dhanbad. ... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondents-BCCL : M/s Amit Kr. Sinha & Anoop Kr. Mehta, Advocates .... CAV on 14/11/2017 Pronounced on 10/01/2018 Per Pramath...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 6870 of 2007 Godnath Mahto, Son of Late Madho Mahto, Resident of Village-Balsagra, P.O. Balsagra, P.S. Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. ....... Petitioner Versus 1. The Central Coalfields Limited through its Managing Director, Darbhanga House, Ranchi. 2.The Director Personnel, Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, Ranchi. 3.The Project Officer, Topa Colliery, Topa Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. 4.The General Manager, Topa Project, Central Coalfields Limited, Mandu, District-Hazaribagh. .... Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK --- For the Petitioners : Mr.Gautam Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Respondents : Mrs. Ranjana Mukherjee, Adv. . CAV on 01/11/2017 Pronounced on 10/01 /2018 Per Pramath Patnaik, J.In the accompanied writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 02.08.2007 vide Annexure-3 and letter dated 19.09.2007 vide Annexure-4, whereby the da...
Tag this Judgment!