Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BAIL APPLN.2768/2019 Date of Decision :04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: ANIL @ BUNTY STATE Through : versus Mr.Jai Ram Garg, Advocate. ........ Petitioner ..... Respondent Through : Ms.Radhika Kolluru, APP for the State with SI Nishu Sangwan, PS South Rohini CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present bail application has been filed by the applicant seeking regular bail in case FIR No.99/2018 under Sections 376D/506 IPC, 6 POCSO Act and 66E/67 (A) Information Technology Act registered at PS South Rohini. Status report is on record.2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated; no incriminating material has been recovered from the his possession; the mobile phone was recovered from the co- accused Himanshu who has already been discharged. It is further submitted that at the time of medical examination, the mother of the prosecutrix has refused the internal exa...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P.793/2019 Date of Decision :04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ........ Petitioner Mr.Mridul Jain, Spl.PP. Through : versus SANJEEV KUMAR & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through : Mr.Dinesh Garg, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) Crl.M.A.39227/2019 (u/S482Cr.P.C.) in Crl.Rev.P.793/2019 1. The present application has been filed by the respondents seeking clarification as to whether the petitioner/CBI can play the CDs containing recordings before the trial court. He has drawn the attention of this Court to the order dated 16.10.2019 passed by the trial court whereby the trial court permitted the counsel to seek clarification on the said aspect.2. It is noted that earlier, vide judgment dated 23.09.2019, an application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner/CBI to recall three witnesses, namely Nikhil Malhotra, S.K.Khullar and the complainant-Vijender Singh ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 705/2016 Date of Decision:04. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: SANTOSH RAWAT ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. B. N. Sharma, Mr. Summinder Paswan and Mr. V. P. Singh, Advocates. STATE & ORS Versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for R-1/State. Mr. D. D. Tripathi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 26.10.2016 passed by the learned Special Judge (P. C. Act), CBI-03, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 19.09.2015 and the order on sentence dated 07.10.2015 was dismissed and the petitioner was held Crl. Rev. P. 705/2016 Page 1 of 3 guilty for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N. I. Act, 1881 and was sentenced to undergo SI for a period of one year alongwith compensation of Rs.7,00,000/- and in default of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 2805/2019 PRAVEEN BANSAL & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr Shiv Charan Garg Imran Khan, with Mr Advocates. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ....... RESPONDENTS Through: Mr Sanjay Lao, ASC with Singh for Karanjeet Mr Sharma, Advocate State. SI Sanjay Kumar, P.S. Prasad Nagar. Mr Sunil Upadhyay, Advocate for R2 to R8. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU % VIBHU BAKHRU, J ORDER0412.2019 The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, praying 1. that the FIR No.60/2012 under Section 323/325/308/3of the IPC, registered with PS Prasad Nagar and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed. The said petition is premised on a settlement arrived at between 2. the petitioner and respondent nos. 2 to 8.3. The petitioner was engaged in the construction of a building at W.P.(CRL) 2805/2019 Page 1 of 5 Plot No.E-16/1103, Tank Road, Bapa Nagar. The said building collapsed in the intervening night of 30.0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on :20. 11.2019 Judgment pronounced on :04. 12.2019 + LPA1602019, CM Appl. 10499/2019 PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ANR ..... Appellants Through Mr. Rajesh Gautam & Ms. Sakshi Gaur, Advocates. versus S K KARDAM ..... Respondent Through Mr. Raman Gandhi & Ms. Harsha Sharma, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. The present appeal assails the order dated 06.02.2019 passed by a Learned Single Judge of this Court whereby the Learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petition filed by the respondent and has directed the appellants herein to promote the respondent with all consequential benefits with effect from the date other officers were promoted pursuant to the DPC held in 2015.2. Shorn of unnecessary details the relevant facts necessary for adjudication of the present appeal are that the respondent herein was initially appointed as a clerk-cum-cashier on 12.02.1981. H...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~16 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:4. h December, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3796/2019 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through versus DELHI JAL BOARD & ORS ........ Petitioner ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sumeet Pushkarna, Standing Counsel with Mr. Devanshu Lahiny, Adv. for respondent No.1 Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Dacchita Shahi and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advs. for GNCTD Mr. Ajjay Aroraa and Mr. Kapil Dutta, Advs. for respondent nos. 6 and 7 Mr. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr. G.S. Oberoi, Ms. Parul Panthi, Mr. Anant Nigam and Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advs. for DDA Ms. Garima Prashad, Standing Counsel for SDMC CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR % ORDER0412.2019 D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been initiated by this Court suo motu looking to the public interest in connection with improving the status of depleting W.P.(C) 3796/2019 Page 1 of 8 of ground water condition in NCT of Delhi through rain water harvesting fo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI EL.PET. 7/2019 ARUN KUMAR Reserved on:22. 10.2019 Date of decision :04. 12.2019 ........ Petitioner Through: Dr.S.S. Hooda, Adv. versus DR. HARSH VARDHAN ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Nikhil Goel, Mr.Dushyant Sarna & Mr.P. Harold, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA I.A. No.12439/2019 1. This petition arises out of the election for Chandni Chowk Parliamentary Constituency, which took place in May, 2019 for the 17thLok Sabha, wherein the respondent was declared as the successful candidate from the said constituency.2. The petitioner, who claims to be a registered voter from the Chandni Chowk constituency, has challenged the election of the respondent alleging Corrupt Practice under Section 123(2) of The Representation of the People Act, 1951(hereinafter referred to as the Act), on the following grounds: (i) Suppression of the actual Purchase Price of the property bearing flat No.122, 2nd Floor, Delhi Apartment CGHS Ltd. Plot No.15-C, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ROHINTON EDALJI CM(M) 1307/2018 Date of decision:3. d December, 2019. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Tanmaya Mehta, Mr. Raveesh Thukral & Mr. Shubham Mahajan, Advocates (M-9810166390) $~41 * + ARVIND RAI & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Anil Sharma, Mr. Arun Baali & Mr. (M- Siddharth Yadav, Advocates 9999315171) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh (Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 13th August, 2018, by which the... Petitioners application under Section 195 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, for appointment of a Curator, was rejected by the ld. Trial Court.2. The background of the present proceedings is that one Ms. Piroja Edalji and Mr. Hoshang Edalji were 50% owners of property bearing No.213 (lower ground floor), Kailash Hills, New Delhi - 110065 (hereinafter, suit property). Ms. Piroja Edalji passed away on 19th December, 2012, leaving behind two daughters and two sons. The... Pe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 234/2019 Reserved on :17. 10.2019 Pronounced on:03. 12.2019 LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar & Mr. Akhil Sibal, Senior Advocates with Mr. Kirat Singh Nagra, Mr. Kartik Yadav, Mr. Pranav, Mr. Parinay T. Vasandani, Mr. Karanvir Singh, Mr. Shantanu Parashar & Ms. Manjira Dasgupta, Advocates versus EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi & Mr. Arvind Nayar, Senior Advocates with Mr. Krishna Vijay Singh, Mr. Manish Dembla, Mr. Nachiketa Goyal, Mr. Pradyuman Sewar & Mr. Parakram Roy, Advocates for respondent No.1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.1. This is a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking interim injunction restraining the respondents from invoking Retention Money Bank Guarantees (RMBG) for Rs.13,84,35,000/- each dated 18.04.2014 and 08.09.2014 respectively as well as Perform...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d December, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CS(OS) 1020/2009 & IA No.386/2019 (u/O VIII R-1A(3) CPC) VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. Versus AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 1016/2010 & IA No.389/2019 (u/O VII R-14 CPC) AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. Versus VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1020/2009, as per amended plaint dated 22nd October, 2011, is filed for recovery of Rs.28,12,50,000/- along with pendente...
Tag this Judgment!