Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI3d December, 2019 Date of decision:10. h October, 2019 CS(OS) 1020/2009 & IA No.386/2019 (u/O VIII R-1A(3) CPC) VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. Versus AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .... Defendants Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. AND + CS(OS) 1016/2010 & IA No.389/2019 (u/O VII R-14 CPC) AKM ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Abhinav Vasisht, Sr. Adv. with Mr. S.K. Dubey, Mr. Rajmangal Kumar and Mrs. Akshita Sachdev, Advs. Versus VESTA HOLDING PRIVATE LTD & ANR ..... Defendants Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Azhar Alam, Mr. Sankalp Goswami, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 CS(OS) No.1020/2009, as per amended plaint dated 22nd October, 2011, is filed for recovery of Rs.28,12,50,000/- along with pendente...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on : November 01, 2019 Decided on : December 03, 2019 Crl. Appeal No.187/2018 RAJ KUMAR STATE .... Appellant Through: Mr. Sharad Malhotra, Adv. for DHCLSC. versus ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State with ASI Ram Vilas, PS Pahar Ganj. Mr. Sarfraz Khan, Adv. for DSLSA. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA ORDER1 This criminal appeal assailing conviction on charge of rape, notwithstanding the testimony of the prosecutrix conceding the relationship to be consensual, has led to revelation of a pattern of irresponsible exercise of jurisdiction vis--vis victim compensation scheme necessitating measures to be taken so as to curb misuse of public money.2. The appellant was brought to trial in the court of Sessions (case no.28940/2016) in the wake of report (charge-sheet) under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) dated 23.08.2016 submitted by the Station House Officer (SHO) of police stat...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:03. d December, 2019 + RFA9422019, CM APPL Nos.47531/2019, 47533/2019 GINI & JONY LTD ..... Appellant P Pal, Through : Mr.Saket Sikri, Mr.Amit Mr.Ajay Deshpande, Advocates. versus CREONS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through : Mr.Naresh K.Daksh, Advocate YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant against the judgment and decree dated 10.05.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge- 03/South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.10261/2016 (old No.1945/2009) whereby the suit of the respondent for recovery of Rs.67,13,124/- was decreed against appellant to the extent of Rs.44,04,937/- with costs and simple interest @ 10% pa from date of filing of suit till realization.2. a) The brief facts are:-"the appellant company is incorporated under the Companies Act,...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 7327/2018 Through Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Advocate ........ Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Through Mr. Vijay Joshi, Advocate ........ RESPONDENTS P. N. TIWARI $~26 * + CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % versus ORDER0312.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Aggrieved by the non-expunction of the adverse remarks in his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (APAR) for the period between 1st April, 2015 and 31st March, 2016, the... Petitioner who is an Assistant Commandant in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has filed the present petition. He also challenges the rejection of his representations against the adverse remarks by the orders dated 1st March, 2017, 1st May, 2017 and 31st August, 2017.2. The... Petitioner joined the CRPF as Sub-Inspector on 21st October, 1993. He was promoted as Inspector on 17th January, 2003. The... Petitioner states that his performance has consistently been assessed as very good by his superior off...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~A-22 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 ENARCH CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Anil Seth, Advocate. versus LALJI SUPERSPECIALITY HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE GORAKHPUR PVT.LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Taneja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.15876/2019 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 1. This is a petition under Section 29A (4) and (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award.2. Issue notice.3. Mr. Rakesh Taneja, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.4. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent has no O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 456/2019 Page 1 of 2 objection to the time being extended for comple...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~A-30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 INFOSYS LTD. ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Arjun Syal, Advocate versus SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY PARKS OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ravi Kishore, Ms. Reha Mall & Mr. Niraj Singh, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16966/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 & I.A. 16967/2019 1. Issue notice.2. Mr. Ravi Kishore, Advocate, enters appearance on behalf of the respondent and accepts notice.3. Present petition has been filed under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 493/2019 Page 1 of 2 4. A Sole Arbitrator was appointed on 22.03.2018 to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. Appointment of the Arbit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~53 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6172/2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019. HARI KRISHNA BHANDARI & ORS STATE & ANR Through Adv. (appearance not given) versus Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State ....... Petitioners ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Udit Gupta with Mr. A. Singh, Advs. for R-2 Insp. Gulshan, PS Sultan Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 41678/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.A. 41679/2019 In view of the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.C . 6172/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.588/2014 dated 30.05.2014 registered at Police Station Sultanpuri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6172/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 SH. SUNIL KUMAR KHARWAR & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Arun K. Srivastava with Mr. Anil Jaryal, Advs. versus STATE & ANR. CORAM: ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State SI Sandeep, PS Punjabi Bagh SI Mohinder Singh, PS Viaks Puri Mr. Rohit Sehgal, Adv. for R-2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 41689/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.28/2018 dated 13.01.2018 registered at Police Station Punjabi Bagh and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 6176/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3600/2019 SMT SUNITA Through: Mr. R.S. Rai, Adv. ........ Petitioner versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State with SI ........ RESPONDENTS Prakash, PS - Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at PS Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.4. With the consent of all the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL.M.C.3600/2019 Page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.6. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI - Prakash /IO, PS - Burari and submits that matter ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4787/2019 Date of decision:03. 12.2019 KULBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Umesh Gupta, Adv. with Ms.Sushma, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Gurbachan Singh PS Burari. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby JUDGMENT (ORAL) quashing FIR No.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at Police Station Burari, for the offence punishable under Section 354(C) IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL...
Tag this Judgment!