Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member: This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief: i) to call for the records of the 1st respondent pertaining to the scheme which is made in No. 37-36/2004 SPB-I/C dated 20.01.2010 and the order of the 3rd respondent which is made in B.19/7-1/2011 dated 13.06.2012 and to set aside the same; consequent to ii) direct the respondents to appoint the applicant on compassionate ground in any one of the post in the 3rd respondent office on considering his educational qualification with all attendant benefits; 2. The facts of the case are as follows: Applicants father, who was working as Postman in the 3rd respondents office died on 06.09.2010 while in service. The deceased Government employee left behind him the applicant, applicants mother and two sisters. It is stated by the applicant that a sum of Rs.7,700/- is being paid as family pension and the family of the deceased had no movable...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member: 1. This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief: to set aside Memo no. VIG/15-03/12-13 dated 28.06.2012 passed by the 3rd respondent and pass such other orders as are necessary to meet the ends of justice. 2. The fact of the case are as follows: The applicant is presently working as Postal Assistant, Naghalnagar SO Dindigul Division. He prays that the order dated 28.06.2012 passed by the 3rd respondent confirming the order of recovery of Rs. 75000/- at the rate of Rs.2,500/- p.m. passed by the 4th respondent vide communication dated 06.02.2012, from his salary. It is stated by the applicant that the above recovery had been ordered for his alleged negligence in duty while he was functioning as Officiating Post Master in Dindigul HO from 18.01.2008 (AN) to 24.01.2008(AN). It is further stated by the applicant that after receipt of show cause notice dated 19.10.2010, he submitted ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Dr. P. Prabakaran, Member (A): 1. The applicant in this OA had earlier filed another OA viz. OA 862 of 2012 in which this Tribunal on 7.12.2012, had ordered as follows : ..hence the respondents have failed to justify that the impugned order of the Disciplinary Authority is in accordance with Rule 16 of the CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965. As contended by the applicant, the matter may be remitted to the Disciplinary Authority to hold an inquiry, subsequent to the submission of the representation to the charge memo. Under the facts and circumstances of this case, inquiry under sub Rule (3) to (24) of Rule 14 of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965 is a must. Accordingly, we have considered the request of the applicant. Consequently the memo No.F.1/05/04-05 dated 19.3.2012 issued by the 2nd respondent in respect of recovery of amount from the pay and allowances of the applicant and order of the first respondent in Memo No.Vig./15-02/12-13 dated 17.7.2012 confirming the order of the 2nd respondent are liable to be...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
B. Venkateswara Rao, Judicial Member 1. The applicant who was working as Chowkidar (night Watchman) from 6.10.1998 till 31.12.2010 has since been thrown out of employment from 1.1.2011 by oral order of the 2nd respondent has filed this O.A. under Sec.19 of the AT Act 1985 seeking for the following relief: To direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service as Contingent Chowkidar (night Watchman) at Melapalayam SO or any other equivalent posting in the 1st respondent Division consequent to absorb the applicant as MTS with all attendant benefits. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant was sponsored by the employment exchange for appointment to the post of Chowkidar and he was offered appointment vide order dated 27.9.1988 and the applicant was appointed as such vide communication dated 6.10.1988 with a direction to report for duty forthwith at Malapalayam SO. The applicant was working from 6.10.1988 to 31.12.2010, thus rendered 22 years service as Chowkidar....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
(Oral) K. Elango, Judicial Member This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief: i) To call for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to his order of suspension which is made in Memo No. F1/3/11-12 dated 17.08.2011 and the order of the 1st respondent which is made in Memo No. VIG/13-04/11-12 dated 01.03.2012 and set aside the same consequent to ii) direct the respondents to reinstate the applicant into service with all attendant benefits; 2. According to the applicant he was orally asked by the staff of Savings Bank Branch Dindugal to credit a sum of Rs. 30,000/- towards minus balance in SB account No. 267097 of Reddiar Chathram SO. The applicant identified the depositor and recovered the minus balance of Rs. 30,000/- on 25.06.2011 and sent a detailed report. The 2nd respondent directed the applicant to appear before the Inspector of Post Dindugal and to give his statement regarding minus balance in SB Accoun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Oral: K. Elango, Judicial Member This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief: To direct the respondents to pass reasonable orders on the representation of the applicant dated 21.12.2012 and to regularize him in the post of Joint Director, Agriculture as per the communication of the 3rd respondent dated 22.11.2011, 27.09.2012, and 28.01.2013. 2. According to the applicant he entered serviced as Horticultural Assistant in the Agricultural Department of Puducherry on 06.11.1968. He earned promotions and in the year 2005, he was promoted as Additional Director on adhoc basis. On attaining the age of superannuation he retired from service on 31.10.2006 from the post of Additional Director (Agricuture). 3. The grievance of the applicant is that many of his juniors had been promoted to the post of Additional Director w.e.f. 02.06.2003, whereas the applicant was denied promotion to the said post. Hence he filed O.A. NO. 8...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
K. Elango Judicial Member This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals, Act, 1985, seeking the following relief: To call for the records of the respondents with No. 20762/DSE/DTE Estt/A6 2009 dated 22.10.2010 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to consider and appoint the applicant to the post of Trainee Fine Arts Teacher with all other consequential benefits including seniority and arrears of wages and to pass such other or further orders in the interest of justice and thus render justice. 2. According to the applicant he is a Bachelor of Fine Arts degree (BFA for short) and he holds Technical Teacher Certificate and therefore he is fully qualified for the post of Fine Arts Teacher. He belongs to MBC category and as such he is entitled for reservation for the post of Trainee Fine Arts Teacher at a consolidated wages of Rs.6000/- per month. 3. The respondents have issued a notification No. 20762/DSE/Dte.Estt/A6/2009 dated 18...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
R. Satapathy, Administrative Member This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 seeking the following relief: to issue directions to the respondents 1 and 2 to include the name of the applicant herein in the Select List for promotion as Principal Chief Conservator of Forests and notwithstanding and without reference to the pendency of charge memo issued in Letter no. 33392/FR Spl A/97-2 dated 16.04.1998 by the 2nd respondent and to promotion him as such and pass such further or other order as deemed fit and thus render justice - 2. The facts of the case are as follows: The applicant was directly recruited to Indian Forest Service (for short IFS) and was allotted to Tamil Nadu Cadre in the year 1977. He had been further promoted to the post of Conservator of Forests, Chief Conservator of Forests on various dates. He was also promoted as Addl. Principal Chief Conservator of Forests on 14.11.2005 and he is now serving as such. 3. The main grieva...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
R. Satapathy, Administrative Member Originally the application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals, Act, 1985, by N.Vijayakumar on 10.06.2010. When the O.A was pending before this Tribunal, the said Vijayakumar died on 29.12.2010. Hence his Legal Representatives filed M.A. No. 635/2011 for bringing them on record. This Bench vide order dated 30.09.2011 allowed the M.A No. 635/2011. The legal heirs are on record. 2. The relief claimed in the O.A is as follows: (i) to call for the records relating to G-26031/2/2009 A (NG) dated 11.12.2009 passed by the 1st respondent and G.26031/2/2009 A(NG) dated 18.03.2010 passed by the 2nd respondent and to set aside the same. (ii) to direct the respondents to refund the sum of Rs.47,160/- recovered pursuant to the order dated 24.06.2002 with interest at 12% per annum. 3. The facts of the case are as under: Late Vijayakumar was initially appointed as Skilled Worker Gr. II (SW II for short) on 29.09.1987 and he was further prom...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
R. Satapathy, Administrative Member This application has been filed under Sec. 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief: To cal for the records pertaining to bearing No. 158/99 dated 23.11.1999 and order bearing No.P[S]443/1/893/2007 dated 14.07.2008 of the 2nd respondent and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to fix the appropriate seniority position of the applicants by revising the seniority list dated 18.03.2005 and 31.01.2007 in the post of JE /II/Works and grant all consequential benefits including higher promotion and pass such further or other orders which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case and render justice. 2. The facts of the case are that the applicant was initially appointed as Casual Labour on 07.12.76 and he was empanelled as Group D on regular basis as Gangman on 08.01.89 and confirmed in the year 1991 and promoted as Supervisor Group C during 1997 in the regular cadre....
Tag this Judgment!