Skip to content


Vikas Jha & Ors vs.state (Nct) of Delhi & Anr - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided On
AppellantVikas Jha & Ors
RespondentState (Nct) of Delhi & Anr
Excerpt:
.....respondents through: mr.panna lal sharma, app for state with w/si renu and w/si radha, ps – delhi cantt. mr. krishan kumar, adv. for r-2 coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait judgment (oral) 1. vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing fir no.113/2018 registered at police station – delhi cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. notice issued.3. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and counsel for the respondent no.2.4. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is crl.m.c.391/2019 page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.5. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.6......
Judgment:

$~22 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

04. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 371/2019 VIKAS JHA & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Vikas Padora and Mr. Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advs. versus STATE (NCT) OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with W/SI Renu and W/SI Radha, PS – Delhi Cantt. Mr. Krishan Kumar, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.113/2018 registered at Police Station – Delhi Cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. Notice issued.

3. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.

4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C.391/2019 Page 1 of 3 taken up for final disposal.

5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

6. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 04.01.2019.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners pray that the present petition may be allowed in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

8. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel – Mr. Krishan Kumar, Advocate and has been identified by W/SI Renu, PS – Delhi Cantt. and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.113/2018 registered at Police Station – Delhi Cantt. and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed. CRL.M.C.391/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER04 2019 PB CRL.M.C.391/2019 Page 3 of 3


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //