Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 14.09.2006 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 356 of 2002, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the opposite parties to pay the insured amount of Rs. 1,00,000/- with accidental benefits to the complainant together with interest @9% p.a. from 12.10.2001, the date of repudiation of the claim till payment and Rs. 1,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that late Sh. Sita Ram Verma, the deceased husband of the complainant “ Smt. Yashoda, was posted as Assistant Teacher in National Inter College, Dhanauri, Haridwar and he died on 14.07.1998 on account of illness. During his lifetime, the life assured had purchased life insurance policy No. 250498871 for assured sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with accidental benefit. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the order dated 19.02.2013 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 158 of 2011, has been preferred with a delay of 87 days. 2. For condonation of 87 days delay in filing the appeal, the appellant has filed an application for condonation of delay (Paper Nos. 34 to 35) supported with an affidavit of Sh. Ajay Sharma, Administrative Officer of the appellant “ College (Paper No. 36), but in the affidavit, the contents of the application for condonation of delay have been verified and no averment has been made by the appellant in the affidavit regarding delay in filing the appeal. 3. In the application for condonation of delay, it has been stated that for the first time on 27.05.2013, the appellant came to know about the impugned order on making contact from their counsel; that thereupon the appellant asked their counsel to obtain the certified copy of the imp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.10.2009 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 373 of 2007, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint against the opposite party Nos. 1 and 2 and directed them to pay to the complainant the cost of 90 bags of A.C.C. cement and Rs. 1,500/- towards the cost of litigation within a month from the date of the order. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the complainant - Sh. Suresh Kumar Kanaujia started construction of his house on 28.03.2007 in which he used A.C.C. cement purchased from M/s Shree Balaji Trading Company, Laksar, District Haridwar “ opposite party No. 3. Opposite party No. 3 is the dealer of M/s A.C.C. Cement Ltd., Area Office, Dehradun “ opposite party No. 1. The cement is distributed to the dealers through District Distribution Officer, A.C.C. cement, Haridwar “ opposite party No. 2. It is alleged that when the painter ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 19.09.2011 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 73 of 2010, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant to pay sum of Rs.10,23,000/- to the respondent together with interest @9% p.a. from the date of filing of the consumer complaint till payment; Rs.10,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.5,500/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant was the registered owner of JCB machine bearing registration No. HR-55-F-0916, which was insured with the appellant “ National Insurance Company Limited for the period from 06.02.2009 to 05.02.2010 at an IDV of Rs.14,00,000/-. During the validity of insurance policy, the said vehicle met with an accident on 19.07.2009 and got completely damaged. The FIR of ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 26.09.2011 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 189 of 2009, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant to pay sum of Rs.13,50,000/- to the respondent together with interest @9% p.a. from the date of filing of the consumer complaint till payment; Rs.10,000/- towards mental agony and Rs.5,000/- towards litigation expenses. The District Forum has directed the respondent to surrender the registration certificate of the machine with the appellant, so that the same can be legally cancelled. The appellant was given liberty to use the machine after recovering it from the ditch at their expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant “ Sharda Associates was the registered owner of JCB Excavator Machine bearing registra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President, J. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 17.10.2011 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 174 of 2006, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant “ opposite party to pay sum of Rs. 1,30,000/- to the respondent “ complainant together with interest @9% p.a. from the date of lodging the claim till payment; Rs. 20,000/- towards mental agony and Rs. 10,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant is the registered owner of vehicle No. UP07-L-9034, which was being driven by Sh. Shyam Singh, who was having a valid driving licence. The said vehicle was insured with the appellant “ The New India Assurance Company Limited for the period from 18.05.2006 to 17.05.2007. On 19.07.2006, the complainant took booking of household...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
C.C. Pant, Member. 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 27.11.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun, in consumer complaint No. 230 of 2012 thereby dismissing the same. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainants“Sh. Roshanlal Davessar and Smt. Madhubala Davassar have a joint saving bank account with G.P.O., Dehradun bearing A/c No. 796375. Besides this Saving Bank A/c, each one of the complainants had opened two separate accounts on 18.12.2009, bearing a/c no. 531532 and 531533 respectively under Monthly Income Scheme (or M.I.S.) of the Post Office and deposited a sum of Rs. 4,50,000/- in each account which yielded an interest of Rs. 3,000/- per month per account, totaling to Rs. 6,000/- per month. The interest so accrued was credited in the joint saving bank account of the complainants. The complainants have alleged that the Post Office did not honour a cheque dated 02.05.2012 issued by them for Rs. 12,000/- and debited an amoun...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 22.11.2011 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 133 of 2011, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant “ opposite party to immediately restore the gas supply of the respondent “ complainant and the appellant “ opposite party was also directed to pay compensation / damages of Rs. 5,000/- to the respondent “ complainant. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that the complainant had taken a gas connection from the opposite party “ Haridwar Gas Agency. The gas was regularly supplied to the complainant till February, 2010, but the gas was not supplied to the complainant after February, 2010. The opposite party asked the complainant to complete certain formalities, which the complainant complied with, but inspit...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
C.C. Pant, Member: 1. This appeal is directed against the order dated 22.05.2012 passed by the District Forum, Dehradun in consumer complaint No. 156 of 2009, whereby the District Forum has partly allowed the consumer complaint against the opposite party No. 1 and directed them to pay to the complainant a sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation. The District Forum has also directed the opposite party No. 1 to pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- towards cost of litigation to the complainant. The above amount was directed to be paid within a month (30 days) from the date of the order, failing which the complainant was also held entitled to interest @ 9% per annum on the above amount from the date of filing the consumer complaint till the date of actual payment. 2. The facts of the case, in brief, are that the complainant - Sh. Ankit Singh had purchased a car named Honda City, bearing registration No. UA08-J-9099, on 23.04.2007 from M/s Divine Automobile Pvt. Ltd., Mohabbewala, Saharanpur Road, Dehra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun
B.C. Kandpal, President: 1. This appeal, under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, is directed against the order dated 11.06.2012 passed by the District Forum, Udham Singh Nagar in consumer complaint No. 112 of 2010, whereby the District Forum has allowed the consumer complaint and directed the appellant to settle the claim of the respondent as per the insurance policy within a period of one month and to pay the claim amount to the respondent together with interest @6% p.a. from the date of lodging of the claim till payment and Rs. 2,000/- towards litigation expenses. 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that late Sh. Sanjay Siddhu, the deceased husband of the complainant “ Smt. Alka Siddhu, during his lifetime, had purchased an insurance policy from the appellant “ Reliance Life Insurance Company Limited known as Reliance Wealth + Health Plan. The proposal form for the said policy was submitted on 22.09.2008. The...
Tag this Judgment!