Court : Delhi
$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 12487/2018 MD. SONU ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber with Mr. Bhanu Gupta, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Government Counsel with Ms. Bushra Waseem, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0612.2019 1. The... Petitioner, who is serving in the Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB), has filed this petition challenging orders dated 23rd April, 2018 and 30th August, 2018, as well as a Show Cause Notice (SCN) dated 20th October, 2018 issued to him terminating his services as Constable (GD).2. The background facts are that Respondent No.4 Staff Selection Commission (SSC) issued an advertisement dated 15th December, 2012 for filling up the post of Constable (GD) in the CAPF and Rifle Man (GD) in Assam Rifles, 2013. The... Petitioner applied for the posts as an OBC candidate enclosing his OBC certificate issued from...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~8 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8687/2017 and CM APPL. 35657/2017 (stay) UNION OF INDIA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Rashmi Malhotra, Advocate. versus DR. RAJENDRA PRASAD ..... Respondent Through: Respondent in person. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0612.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present petition by the Union of India is directed against an order dated 6th February, 2017 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi disposing of OA No.456 of 2014 filed by the Respondent and directing that he should be granted Senior Administrative Grade (SAG) with effect from 23rd January, 2007 i.e. the date when his juniors were so promoted, ignoring the two Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) for the years ending in March 2001 and March 2003. The Respondent was held entitled to all consequential benefits. The said impugned order was to be complied with within 3 months.2. This is the 7th round of litigation ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~23 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3227/2019 Date of decision:06. 12.2019 SANJAY GROVER & ANR. STATE & ANR. ........ Petitioner Through Mr. Nishant Sharma, Adv. versus Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State Mr. Ashish, Adv. for R-2. ASI Suresh PS Bindapur. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.937/2017 dated 21.12.2017 registered at Police Station Binda Pur and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 29.11.2015 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born out of the wedlock namely Crl.M.C. 3227/2019 Page 1 of 2 Yug. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and responden...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~56 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4862/2019 & CRL.M.A. 36811/2019 CRL.M.A. 36813/2019 SATHIYAPRIYA & ANR. Through Adv. (appearance not given) ........ Petitioners versus STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Vijay Pal, North Avenue Respondent nos.2&3 in person ........ RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Vide the present petition, the petitioners seeks quashing of FIR1 09/2018 dated 26.03.2018 and Final Report No.SC. 260/2019 dated 13.2.2019 u/s 12 of the POCSO Act and the proceedings arising out of the said FIR pending in the Court of Ld. ASJ ( POCSO Act), Patiala House Court, New Delhi against the... Petitioners and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4862/2019 Page 1 of 4 2.3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.4. Learned couns...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + BAIL APPLN. 3023/2019 BIJENDER SINGH LATHER ........ Petitioner Through Mr.Siddhartha Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Jasbir Malik, Mr.Shantanu Sharma & Mr.Neeraj Khapra, Advs. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State. SI Kamal Kohli PS EOW. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) Crl. M.A. 42063/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. Bail Appln.3023/2019 & Crl.M.A. 42062/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to grant anticipatory bail to the... Petitioner in FIR No.59 of 2019 dated 04.04.2019 Police Station, Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi under Sections 406, 420 & 120-B of IPC. Bail Appln.3023/2019 Page 1 of 10 4. The brief facts leading to filing of the said petition are that Prabhu Shanti Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Company"), a priva...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6296/2019 SAHIL SETHI & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Sanjeev Sharma, Adv. versus STATE, N.C.T OF DELHI & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State ASI Sangeeta, ASI Narender Pal, Mukherjee Nagar Respondent no.3 in person Adv. (appearance not given) for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.653/2018 dated 22.11.2018 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for respondent no.3 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal. CRL.M.C. 6296/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.3 got married on 01.12.2017 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 Through Mr.Vaibhav Kalra, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus MAHESH PAL & ANR CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State Respondent no.2 in person W/SI Sangeeta, PS Seempuri Crl. M.A. 42070/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.353/2016 dated 08.03.2016 registered at Police Station Seema Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6297/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.02.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One child was born o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~55 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:06. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4060/2019 & RL.M.A.33702/2019 & 36891/2019 MANMOHAN SHARMA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Meet Malhotra, Sr. Adv with Mr. Kushank Singh, Mr. Abhinav, Mr. Yashovardhan & Mr. Syed Massod, Advocates STATE & ANR. versus Through Mr. K K Ghai, APP for State ........ RESPONDENTS SI Dharmender, PS Vasant Kunj (N) Mr. Sunny Sharma & Mr. Rahul Gupta, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek directions thereby to quash the FIR No.576/2016 dated 02.12.2016, registered at P.S. Vasant Kunj North, Delhi for the offences punishable under Sections 323/ 341/354/354B/5IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom.2. The case of the petitioners is that they are residents of Sector-A, Pocket-B & C, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and respondent no.2 is the complainant in the FIR mentioned above, filed against the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: RAVI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ansar Ahmad Chaudhary, Advocate Versus STATE OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Radhika Kolluru, APP for State with SI Dheer Singh, P.S. Farsh Bazar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J (ORAL) CRL.M.A. 42084/2019 (Exemption) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking setting aside/recall of the impugned order dated 12.02.2019 passed by the learned ASJ/Special Judge (NDPS), Karkardooma Courts, whereby the petitioners application to recall the witness Chetan Sharma (PW-6) for cross examination in FIR No.183/2011 under Section 307 IPC & Sections 25/25(54)/59/307 of Arms Act, 1959 P.S. Farsh Bazar, Delhi was dismissed. CRL.M.C. 6301/2019 Page 1 of 4 2. Learned counsel for the petitione...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 IN THE MATTER OF: CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 Reserved on Decision on :02. 12.20 06.12.2019 ........ Petitioner SH. ARUN VATS Through: Mr. S.C. Vats, Advocate. versus MS. PALLAVI SHARMA & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Advocate along CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI with R-1 in person. The present revision petition has been filed challenging the order 1. dated 05.07.2018 passed by the Family Court in MT No.696/2016 whereby in the respondents petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C., an interim maintenance of Rs.33,005/- per month was granted to the respondent/wife and the minor child.2. In the aforesaid petition, it is the case of respondent/wife that she was thrown out of her matrimonial house and was with her mother at her parental home along with her minor child. It was also stated that she had no source of income and claimed Rs.80,000/- per month as maintenance. CRL.REV.P. 751/2018 Page 1 of 4 3. It w...
Tag this Judgment!