Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.12807 of 2013 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ------------------Susanta Kumar Sahoo and Others Petitioners Opp. Parties - versus Union of India and Others For Petitioners: M/s. Hemant Kumar Mohanty, D.K. Pradhan, B. Biswal For Opp.Parties: Mrs. Bharati Dash (for opposite party no.1) M/s. T. Pattnayak and S. Pattnayak (for opposite party no.3) Mr. B.S. Tripathy-1 (for opposite party nos. 7, 8 &9) PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 18.11.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.| Date of Judgment: 04.12.2014 The petitioners, who are claiming themselves to be the parents of some of the non-NTPC students of St. Marys School, Deepshikha, NTPC in the district of Angul, have filed this petition assailing the unusual hike of school fees for the session 2013-14, communicated with the notice dated 01.04.2014, vide Annexure-2 as in view of the judgment of this Court in Tapas Kumar Sahu and ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3594 of 2002 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------- Padmanabha Gouda Petitioner -versusOrissa Forest Corporation and others Opp. Parties For Petitioner : M/s MaNo.Misha, P.K.Das, S.K.Pradhan, B.K.Mishra Mr. T. Mishra. For Opp.Parties : M/s. S.K. Das, B.C.Pradhan, M.K.Das, K.Pattnaik. PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 21.11.2014 | Date of judgment: 04.12.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The petitioner, who was working as a Mate (No.as a Field Assistant) under the Orissa Forest Corporation Ltd. has filed this application assailing the order passed by the Disciplinary Authority imposing punishment vide order dated 31.07.2001, Annexure-7 and enhancement thereof in appeal by the appellate authority, vide order dated 29.08.2002, Annexure-11 giving compulsory retirement to the petitioner from service. 2 2. The factual matrix of the case in hand is that the petitioner while ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK CONTC No.1187 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Section 15 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. ---------Dhabala Prasad Pradhan Petitioner -versusRamesh Chandra Panda Contemnor/ opposite party For Petitioner : M/s.Susanta Kumar Dash, A.K.Otta, A.Dhalsamanta, & S.Das For Opp.Party : Mr.A.K.Mishra, Addl.Govt. Advocate PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE B.R.SARANGI Date of hearing: 28.11.2014| Date of judgment : 04.12.2014 Dr. B.R.Sarangi, J.The petitioner files this petition under Section 15 read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnor-opposite party for non-compliance of the direction issued by this Court vide order dated 21.10.2014 passed in W.P.(C) No.9997 of 2014.2. The short facts of the case in hand is that the petitioner had purchased a piece of land comprising of an area of Ac.0.22 out of Plot No.1708 in mouza-Gopalpur in the district of Cuttack p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK MATA No.24 of 2014 In the matter of an application under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984. ---------------Basanti Sethi Appellant -VersusParamananda Sethi Respondent For Appellant : M/s. S.K. Tripathy, and A.K. Mishra. For Respondent : M/s. S.K. Mishra, J.Pradhan, D.K. Pradhan and S.K. Rout. PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 28.10.2014 Date of judgment : 02.12.2014 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pramath Patnaik, J.This appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 challenging the legality and propriety of the judgment and order dated 07.02.2014 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Puri in Civil Proceeding No.368 of 2010 allowing the 2 proceeding instituted by the pre...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT : CUTTACK MATA No.93 of 2012 In the matter of an application under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984. ---------------Smt. Pratima Mohapatra @ Nepak Appellant -VersusDibakar Mohapatra Respondent For Appellant : M/s. R.K. Patnaik, G. Acharya, S. Jena, B.C. Parija and R.R. Rout. For Respondent : M/s. D.P. Dhal, S.K. Dash, and A. Tripathy PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE VINo.PRASAD AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAMATH PATNAIK -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Date of hearing : 11.11.2014 Date of judgment :02.12.2014 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Pramath Patnaik, J.This appeal has been filed by the appellant wife under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984. The challenge has been made to the impugned judgment and order dated 04.11.2011 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar in Civil Proceeding No...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
W.P.(C) No.19341 of 2014 6. 29.11.2014 In this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of order dated 25.9.2014 passed by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack in O.A. No.3015(C) of 2014 under Annexure-9 and order dated 20.9.2014 passed by the Director, Secondary Education, Odisha under Annexure-8.2. Heard Mr. K.P. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Samal, learned Standing Counsel for the School Mass Education Department-opposite party nos.1 to 3.3. The short facts in the present case are as follows; On recommendations of DPC held on 17.01.2014, in accordance with Education Rule 18 of the Orissa Sub-ordinate (Method of Recruitment and Conditions of Services), 1993, the petitioner along with others was provisionally promoted and posted in the High Schools noted against each in the rank of Senior SES Headmasters. The petitioner was posted at Raghunath Bidyapitha, Soro vide Annexure-3 in the rank of Senior SES Headmasters. A perusal of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
1 ORISSA HIGH COURT; CUTTACK FIRST APPEAL No.158 OF 2001 From a judgment and decree dated 16.4.1999 and 21.4.1999 respectively passed by Shri B.K. Dash, learned Ist Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Cuttack in T.S. No.312 of 1991. ----------------------State of Orissa, through the Collector, Cuttack and another. Appellants -VersusOrissa Olympic Association, through Hony. General Secretary and others. Respondents For appellants. Addl. Government Advocate For respondents: M/s. B.H.Mohanty, Sr. Advocate, D.P. Mohanty, J.K. Bastia, B.Das, R.K. Nayak, S.C.Mohanty & T.K.Mohanty. (for respondent no.1) M/s. D.Mohapatra, M.Mohapatra G.R.Mohapatra & A.Dash (for respondent nos.2 to5) -------------------Date of judgment: 29 .11.2014. -------------------PRESENT; THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.P.RAY. B.P.RAY, J.This is an appeal under section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure by the defendants challenging the judgment and decree dated 16.4.1999 and 21.4.1999 respectively passed in T.S. No.3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK RVWPET NO.49 OF 2007 From the order dated 05.05.2005 passed by this Court in O.J.C. No.13273 of 2001. Laxmidhar Das Petitioner -versusState of Orissa & others For Petitioner : Opposite Parties M/s. S.S. Das, R. Sahoo, K.Ch. Mohapatra & J.K. Swain. For Opp. Parties : Mr. B.P. Pradhan, Addl. Government Advocate. (for opposite party nos.1 to3) : Mr. T. Pattnaik & S. Pattnaik. (for opposite party no.5) : M/s. A.P. Bose, R.K. Mohanty, M. Pradhan, S.K. Mohanty & N. Hota. (for opposite party nos.6 to12) P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE PRADIP MOHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE BISWAJIT MOHANTY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Date of Judgment:28 .11.2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- B. Mohanty, J.This Review Petition has been filed by one Laxmidhar Das, who was opposite party no.5 in OJ.No.13273 of 2001, wi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) NO.165 OF 2009 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------- M/s. Chandrika Sao, represented through its proprietor Sri Chandrika Sao ... Petitioner ... Opp. parties -VersusSales Tax Officer, Balasore Range, Balasore and another For Petitioner For Opp. Parties : M/s. Prakash Ku. Jana & S.C. Sahoo : Mr. R.P. Kar, Standing Counsel P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.11.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer for quashing the order of assessment dated 18.6.2008 (Annexure-1) passed by opposite party No.2-Assessing Authority under Section 42 of the Orissa Value Added Tax Act, 2004 (hereinafter referred to as OVAT Act.) for the tax period from 1.4.2005 to 30.11.2006 on the ground that the said order is barred by limitation and has been passed without complying with the statutory requir...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Orissa
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK. W.P.(C) No.11723 OF 2011 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. ----------- M/s Srinivas Traders Petitioner -VersusState of Odisha represented by Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Odisha and others. Opp. parties For Petitioner : M/s. Damodar Pati, S.K.Mishra & R.S.Das For Opp. Parties : Mr. R.P.Kar (Standing Counsel) -----------P R E S E N T: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I.MAHANTY AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.N. MAHAPATRA Date of Judgment: 26.11.2014 B.N. MAHAPATRA, J.This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the order dated 11.08.2010 (Annexure-1) passed by opposite party No.2-Orissa Sales Tax Tribunal, Cuttack (for short, the Tribunal) in S.A. No.1539/2004-05 pertaining to the year 2002-03 on the ground that the said order suffers the vice of perversity as the grounds No.taken either by the petitioner or by opposite party No.1-Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Odisha, Cuttack have been...
Tag this Judgment!