Asif vs.state & Anr

Asif vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 04, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1227044

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1227044
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Dec 04, 2019
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Asif

Advocate Mr. Shashank Vats

Respondent

State & Anr

Advocate Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai

Excerpt

.....up for final disposal.7. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.8. respondent no.2 is personally present in court. original of her aadhaar card (bearing no.231724765976) is seen and returned. she submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of relative and well wishers have entered into an amicable settlement and have settled all their disputes amicably out of the court as they belong to one locality and both have agreed to live peacefully in future.10. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the total settlement amount and prays that the present petition may be quashed.11. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. crl.m.c.6193/2019 page 2 of 3 12. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at police station - shahdara, delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.13. the petition is allowed accordingly. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge december04 2019 pb crl.m.c.6193/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~58 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 Date of decision:

04. 12.2019 ASIF STATE & ANR Through: Mr. Shashank Vats, Adv. ........ Petitioner

versus ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. Kamal Kr. Ghai, APP for State R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL.M.A. 41774/2019 (Exemption) 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6193/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at Police Station - Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. CRL.M.C.6193/2019 Page 1 of 3 6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court. Original of her Aadhaar Card (bearing No.231724765976) is seen and returned. She submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. The petitioner and respondent no.2 with the intervention of relative and well wishers have entered into an amicable settlement and have settled all their disputes amicably out of the Court as they belong to one locality and both have agreed to live peacefully in future.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has received the total settlement amount and prays that the present petition may be quashed.

11. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further. CRL.M.C.6193/2019 Page 2 of 3 12. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.394/2013 dated 17.10.2013 registered at Police Station - Shahdara, Delhi and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13. The petition is allowed accordingly. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER04 2019 PB CRL.M.C.6193/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Asif vs State & Anr Same Subject Education