Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.REV.P. 924/2019 Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 IN THE MATTER OF: GOPAL CHAWLA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Banerjee and Mr. Bikram Singh, Advocates. YOGITA SAXENA @ POOJA CHAWLA & ANR......... RESPONDENTS Versus Through: Mr.(appearance not given), Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.(ORAL) 1. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner assailing the impugned order dated 30.05.2019 passed by Judge, Family Court, Shahdara District, Delhi wherein the Court granted maintenance of Rs.8000/- to the respondents (Rs.5000/- to Respondent no.1 and Rs.3000/- to Respondent no.2) 2. The marriage between the petitioner and Respondent No.1 was solemnized in accordance with Hindu rites and ceremonies on 09.07.2011. A daughter namely Dipanshi (Respondent No.2) was born out of the said wedlock on 11.07.2013. However, due to difference between the parties, Crl. Rev. P. 924/2019 Page 1 of 3 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:6. h December, 2019 + CM (M) 1738/2019 RATTAN MEHTA & ORS. ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. G.P. Thareja & Ms. Shalini (M- Advocates Gandharva, 9811123833) versus GAYATRI SHAH & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira Arora & Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates. (M-9811006760) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral) 1. The present petition challenges the impugned order dated 1st August, 2019, by which the Plaintiffs/Respondents (hereinafter, Plaintiffs) application under Order XI Rule 1 CPC has been allowed by the ld. ADJ.2. The petition arises out of a suit for possession, mesne profits and damages in respect of a shop located in property bearing No.25-A, C-Block, Vasant Vihar Market (local shopping Centre-I), New Delhi (hereinafter, suit property), filed by Smt. Preeti Shah and Smt. Santosh Shah against various Defendants who are part of the same family and one M/s Mahima Caps...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~31, 34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 + W.P.(C) 12857/2019 CONSORTIUM OF SIEMENS LTD. INDIA, SIEMENS SA SPAIN AND SIEMENS AG GERMANY & ORS.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Advocate, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate and Ms. Bhavna Mishra, Advocate. versus DEDICATED FREIGHT CORRIDOR CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. & ANR. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Pinky Anand, ASG with Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Advocate and Ms. Saurabh Sharma, for respondent No.1. Mr. Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Preet Singh, Advocate and Ms. Rachita Garg, Advocate for respondent No.2. Advocate Singh, Jagjit + W.P.(C) 12868/2019 CONSORTIUM OF SIEMENS LTD. INDIA, SIEMENS SA SPAIN AND SIEMENS AG GERMANY & ORS.....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Senior Advocate, Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Advocate, Mr. WPC12857/2019, 12868/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Anand, Adv. + WP (C) 1363/2013 MEENA OBEROI % 1. versus CAMBRIDGE FOUNDATION SCHOOL AND ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Pramod Gupta, Adv. with Ms. Manogya Singh and Ms. Ankita Khanna, Advs. for R-1 and 2 Ms. Latika Choudhary, Adv. for R-3 and 4 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR The petitioner was appointed as Office Assistant, in the JUDGMENT0512.2019 Respondent No.1 School (hereinafter referred to as the School), on 4th July, 1991, and was confirmed, on the post, in 1993.2. Consequent on the acceptance, of the recommendations of the 6th Central Pay Commission (hereinafter referred to as the 6th CPC) by the Central Government, and the extension, thereof, to teachers, the petitioner represented, on 21st April, 2009, to the School, objecting to the fixation of her pay without extending, to her, the benefit of the said recommendations. This was followed by reminders, dated 5th May, 2009 an...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~72 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 12817/2019 and CM APPL. 52336/2019 (stay) JAMIA COOPERATIVE BANK LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through : Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Tarique Siddiqui, Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Ms. Reetika Gupta and Mr. Aamir Zaidi, Advocates. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. versus Through: CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Mr. Gautam Narayan, ASC with Ms. Dacchita Shahi and Ms. Shivani Vij, Advocates for R1 and R2. Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. Notice. Mr. Gautam Narayan, learned ASC, accepts notice on behalf of the Government of NCT of Delhi/Respondent No.1 and the Registrar of Co- operative Societies (RCS) (Respondent No.2).2. Since the point involved is short, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is heard finally at this stage itself.3. The... Petitioner is a Co-operative Bank, as defined under Section 2 (f) of the Delhi Co-operative Societies Act, 2003 (...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + W.P.(C) 8705/2014 ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv versus K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates NILAMANI MOHANTY Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 2262/2015 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. R.C. GARG & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates 1. Both the present petitions by the Union of India are directed against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and involve an W.P.(C) 8705/2014 & W.P.(C) 2262/2015 Page 1 of 8 identical question of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. While W....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + + W.P.(C) 8705/2014 ........ Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv versus K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates NILAMANI MOHANTY Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates ..... Respondent W.P.(C) 2262/2015 ........ Petitioners Through Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sanjiv K. Saxena, Mr. Ramneek Mishra and Mr. Mukesh Tiwari, Advocates versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. R.C. GARG & ORS. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.: ORDER0512.2019 ........ RESPONDENTS Through Dr. Amit George with Mr. Akshat Gupta and Mr. Swaroop George, Advocates 1. Both the present petitions by the Union of India are directed against orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and involve an W.P.(C) 8705/2014 & W.P.(C) 2262/2015 Page 1 of 8 identical question of law and are accordingly being disposed of by this common order.2. While W....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. L.P. Singh and Mr. Raj Chaudhary, Advs. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State ASI Anil Kumar/ IO, PS-Kanjhawala Ms. Seema Gulati, Adv. for R-2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41907/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.876/2015 dated 30.12.2015 registered at Police Station Kanjhawala, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6240/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~54 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6249/2019 Date of decision:05. 12.2019 VED PARKASH KHURANA & ORS ........ Petitioners Through Mr.Bharat Bagga, Adv. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Balwan Singh PS Mangal Puri. Mr.Uttamjit Singh, Adv. for complainant/R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT CRL. M.A. 41929/2019 JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6249/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.640/2016 dated 26.05.2016 registered at Police Station Mangol Puri, Delhi and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C.6249/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice issued.5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. The petitioner...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~55 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:05. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 6253/2019 SACHIN KHURANA & ORS Through Mr.Bharat Bagga, Adv. ........ Petitioners versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Balwan Singh PS Mangal Puri. Mr.Uttamjit Singh, Adv. for complainant/R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT (ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41941/2019 1.2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6253/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.13/2016 registered at Police Station Ashok Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.6253/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2.6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. The present petition is filed...
Tag this Judgment!