Court : Central Information Commission CIC
Central Information CommissionRoom No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi 110067 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC/SS/C/2011/900551 Name of Complainant Name of Respondent : : Mr. Shamsher Singh Delhi Police, PHQ. ORDER The Commission has received a complaint dated Nil (received on 4.4.2011) from Mr. Shamsher Singh u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against the Delhi Police, PHQ for deemed refusal to his RTI request dated 9.11.2010. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under sections 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, this case is remitted to CPIO, Commissioner of Police, PHQ, New Delhi (along with copy of complaint and RTI-request), with the following directions:(i)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to his RTI-request dated 9.11.2010, CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainant within two weeks of receipt of this order. In case CPIO has already given a reply to the complainant in the matter, he...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CentralInformationCommission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ClubBuilding,NearPostOffice iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj /OldJ.N.U.Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 /NewDelhi110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000846 Complainant : ShriSrikantTiwari CK16/32,Suriya Varanasi221001. ThePublicInformationOfficer DRMOffice NorthEasternRailway GorakhpurDivision Gorakhpur. Dated:13.10.2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xRespondents:Commission has received a complaint petition dated 22.11.10 from Shri SrikantTiwariagainstthePIO,NorthEasternRailway,GorakhpurDivisionunder Section18oftheRighttoInformationAct,regardingdeemedrefusalofhisRTI requestdated22.11.20110. 2. Inordertoavoidmultipleproceedingsundersection18and19oftheRTI Act,viz.,appealsandcomplaints,itisdirectedasfollows: i)DirectionstoCPIODRMOffice,NorthEasternRailway,Gorakhpuris directedasfollows: a) IncasenoreplyhasbeengivenbyCPIOtothecomplainanttohisRTI request dated 22.11.2010 CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainantwithin1weekofreceiptofthisorder. IncaseCPIOhasal...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
Central Information CommissionRoom No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi 110067 Web: www.cic.gov.in Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC/SS/C/2011/900553 Name of Complainant Name of Respondent : : Mrs. Baijayanti Sahu Air India Ltd. ORDER The Commission has received a complaint dated 19.7.2011 from Mrs. Baijayanti Sahu u/s 18 of the RTI Act, 2005, against the Air India Ltd. for deemed refusal to her RTI request dated 11.4.2011. 2. In order to avoid multiple proceedings under sections 19 and 18 of the RTI Act, viz., appeals and complaints, this case is remitted to CPIO, Air India Ltd., New Delhi (along with copy of complaint and RTI-request), with the following directions:(i)In case no reply has been given by CPIO to the complainant to her RTI-request dated 11.4.2011, CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainant within two weeks of receipt of this order. In case CPIO has already given a reply to the complainant in the matter, he should furnish a copy of his rep...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CentralInformationCommission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ClubBuilding,NearPostOffice iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj /OldJ.N.U.Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 /NewDelhi110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000873 Complainant : ShriOmPrakash Sr.Clerk CRDeptt NorthernRailway, Hazratganj,Lucknow. ThePublicInformationOfficer DRMOffice NorthernRailway LucknowDivision Lucknow. Dated:13.10.2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xRespondents:Commissionhasreceivedacomplaintpetitiondated15.4.11fromShriOm Prakash against the PIO, DRM Office, Northern Railway, Lucknow Division, Lucknow under Section 18 of the Right to Information Act, regarding deemed refusalofhisRTIrequestdated9.12.2010. 2. Inordertoavoidmultipleproceedingsundersection18and19oftheRTI Act,viz.,appealsandcomplaints,itisdirectedasfollows: i)DirectionstoCPIODRMOffice,NorthernRailway,LucknowDivision, Lucknowisdirectedasfollows: a) IncasenoreplyhasbeengivenbyCPIOtothecomplainanttohisRTI requestdated9.12.2010CPIOshouldfurnishareplytothecomplainant within1weekofrece...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Opposite Ber Sarai Market, Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067. Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01616/SG/15156 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/01616/SG Appellant : Mr. K. Sathyanarayana Sharma 17-A AD Block, Shalimar Bagh Delhi : Mr. S. Narendrapai P.I.O. & Dy. General Manager Corporation Bank, Head Office Mangalore Mangladevi Temple Road, Pandeshwar, Mangalore - 575001 : : : : : 02/08/2010 06/09/2010 14/09/2010 19/10/2010 25/11/2010RespondentRTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order Second Appeal filed onInformation sought: The Appellant had sought information through 11 queries. Reply of PIO: The PIO had responded giving some information and pointing out that most of the queries do not seek information as defined under Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. Grounds for First Appeal: Refusal is contrary to provisions of RTI Act and a misinterpretation of the provisions. Grounds of Complete info...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001664/SG/15147 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001664/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. P. Shiva Kumar A/225 1st Phase Allwyn Colony, Kukatpally Hyderabad- 500072 Central Public Information Officer, Asst. General Manager Syndicate Bank, Yamjal Branch 6-3-653 Pioneer House Regional Office- City Somajiguda Hyderabad - 500082 19/04/2010 11/05/2010 31/07/2010 31/08/2010 29/10/2010 Reply of PIO The content of the application is perused and the information cannot be furnished. You have already filed a Consumer Case No. 189/2008 against the Bank before CDRF Ranga Reddy Dist seeking compensation of Rs 8.25 lakh with interest in respect of the same issue which you have raised in the RTI Act. The bank as an opposite party has been contesting the same by filing a reply. Meanwhile you have also approached the Banking Ombudsman with a ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001623/SG/15153 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001623/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Munni Devi Shakyavar 429 Durga Bhawan Near Railway Jhansi Outer Signal New Ram Nagar Orai- District Jalaun (UP) CPIO & DGM Allahabad Bank Zonal Office 113/58, Swaroop Nagar, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh 19/05/2010 26/05/2010 10/06/2010 16/07/2010 26/11/2010Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on: : : : :Information Sought: When the Appellants husband, Shri SP Shakyayar, was transferred from Bhopal Zone to Home-Town Jalaun, he was penalized for being a laborious and extremely honest person of Scheduled Tribe & forced to work as Senior Manager (operations) at Orai Branch in Second-line, whereas the most corrupt persons of higher castes were made Branch Head...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001619/SG/15148 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001619/SG Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Suresh Gopal Redkar, House No. 101, Pedawaddo, Near Railway gate, Pedda, Margoa - Goa Central Public Information officer, Bank of India, Zonal Office, Dempo house, Campat , Panaji, Goa 403 001 19/07/2010 16/08/2010 08/09/2010 23/09/2010 22/11/2010 Reply of PIO Concerned PIO replied that the requested information is not available with the branch. Therefore we are unable to provide the same. However the concerned PIO enclosed the vouchers which were available at the branch.Respondent:RTI application filed on PIO replied on First Appeal filed on First Appellate Authority order on Second Appeal received on Q.No 1.: : : : :Query Please provide the date and month wise details of the amount handed over by the Quepern Branch towards the paymen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CentralInformationCommission Dyc Hkou] utnhd Mkd[kkuk/ClubBuilding,NearPostOffice iqjkuk ts-,u-;w- ifjlj /OldJ.N.U.Campus ubZ fnYyh 110067 /NewDelhi110067F.No.CIC/AD/C/2011/000829 Complainant : ShriManiChandra S/oShriKashiram ShivNagarToondla PostToondla Firozabad283204. ThePublicInformationOfficer NorthCentralRailway DRMOffice, AllahabadDivision Allahabad. Dated:12.10.2011ds U nz h ; lwp uk vk;ks xRespondents:Commissionhasreceivedacomplaintpetitiondated6.4.11fromShriMani ChandraagainstthePIO,DRMOffice,NorthCentralRailway,Allahabadunder Section18oftheRighttoInformationAct,regardingdeemedrefusalofhisRTI requestdated25.10.2010. 2. Inordertoavoidmultipleproceedingsundersection18and19oftheRTI Act,viz.,appealsandcomplaints,itisdirectedasfollows: i) DirectionstoCPIO DRMOffice,NorthCentralRailway,Allahabadis directedasfollows: a) IncasenoreplyhasbeengivenbyCPIOtothecomplainanttohisRTI request dated 25.10.2010 CPIO should furnish a reply to the complainantwithin1weekofreceiptofthisor...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Information Commission CIC
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building, Old JNU Campus, Opposite Ber Sarai, New Delhi -110067 Tel: + 91 11 26161796Decision No.CIC/SM/A/2010/001621/SG/15150 Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2010/001621/SG Relevant Facts emerging from the Appeal: Appellant : Mr. Chand Singh Guru Hargobind Nagar, Chahai Road, By-Pass, Backside hand Marriage Palace Faridkot-151203 (PB) : Mr. Surjeet Singh Sachdeva PIO & Chief Manager Punjab and Sind Bank Noble Enclave, Bhaibala Chowk Zonal Office Ludhiana-Punjab Mr. A. S. Jolly PIO & Chief Manager Punjab and Sind Bank Risk Management Department RTI Cell, H.O. 7th Floor, Bank House, 21, Rajendra Place, New Delhi 27/08/2010 20/09/2010 28/09/2010 08/11/2010 25/11/2010Respondent(1)(2):RTI application filed on PIO replied First Appeal filed on Order of First Appellate Authority Second Appeal received on: : : : :Information Sought: Information regarding names of officials who were staying at places other than the place of posting and were paid HRA in 2005 for the last...
Tag this Judgment!