Court : Delhi
$~45 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 CM(M) 1701/2019 and CM APPL. 51535/2019, 51536/2019 M/S D S S BUILDTECH PVT LTD ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashwarya Sinha and Mr. Alok K. Singh, Advocates (M:99993. 9092). MANOJ KAYAL versus Through: ....Respondent Shrey Sinha, Advocate (M:8447355352) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) CM APPL515362019 (for exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CM(M) 1701/2019 & CM APPL. 51535/2019 2. The present petition under Article 227 has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30th October, 2019 passed by the NCDRC. The said order reads as under :-"We have partly heard the learned counsel for the appellants on admission, and perused the entire material on record including inter alia specifically the impugned Order dated 09.01.2019 of the State Commission. The State Commission vide its impugned Order dated 09.01.2019 had allowed ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~1 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. 11.2019 Pronounced on:11. 12.2019 CRL.M.C. 4956/2017 and CRL.M.A. Nos. 19667/2017, 32081/2019, 32082/2019 and 38518/2019 MAHMOOD ASAD MADANI ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Manish Gupta, Mr. Rohit Tomar, Mr. Neelmani, Mr. Niaz Farooqui & Ms. Mrinal, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, SPP with ..... Respondent Ms. Santwana, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby to quash the FIR dated 12.06.2014 being No.RC-08 (A), 2014/CBI/AC- III/New Delhi and subsequent proceedings emanating out of the said FIR pending for trial for the offences punishable under section 120-B read with 420/467/468/471 IPC and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Crl.M.C.4956/2017 Page 1 of 23 2. In the present case, FIR was registered on 12.06.2014 and on the s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:3. d December, 2019 Date of Decision:11. h December, 2019 BAIL APPLN. 2381/2019 & CRL.M.As. 36899/2019 & 36370/2019 MONU KAPOOR ........ Petitioner Through: Dr. Ashutosh & Ms. Fatima, Advocates versus DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Talha Abdul Rahman, Junior Standing Counsel with Mohd. Shaz Khan, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.1. The petitioner has filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr. PC) for the grant of anticipatory bail.2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case as per the status report are that, on 6.09.2018, a seizure of gold was effected from a shop situated at 34/3128, Gali No.34, Beadonpura, BlockP, Karol Bagh, New Delhi 110005 and Lease Agreement of the said shop was in the name of Monu Kapoor, the petitioner herein.3. The statement of one Rahul Kapoor, present in the shop at the time of s...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:11. h December, 2019 + ARTI DEVI W.P.(C) 9407/2019 Through: Mr. Dibyanshu Pandey, Ms. Simran Bhagat & Mr. Veeraragavan N., Advocates (M-9953810683) ........ Petitioner versus JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Monica Arora, Standing Counsel, JNU with Mr. Harsh Ahuja, Ms. Anushkha Ashok along with Dr. Pramod Kumar, Registrar (M- 9810246300) Mr. Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel GNCTD with Mr. Chaitanya Gosain, Advocates (M-9999981270) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) The... Petitioner had filed a complaint on 9th January, 2018 before the 1. Internal Complaints Committee (hereinafter ICC) of the JNU, constituted under the University Grants Commission (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal of Sexual Harassment of Women Employees and Students in Higher Educational Institution) Regulations, 2015. The ICC submitted its recommendations on 2nd August, 2018. One of the recommendations o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:25. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:10. h December, 2019 W.P. (C) 3488/2017 & C.M. APPLs. 3091/2019 and 3092/2019 R.S. MISRA THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Through: versus .....Petitioner... Petitioner-in-person. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The... Petitioner, by way of the present petition, challenges an order dated 2nd September, 2016 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (CAT), dismissing his O.A. No.187/2015, as well as an order dated 2nd November, 2016, dismissing his R.A. No.243/ 2016.2. It must be noted that the... Petitioner, who appears in person, had at one stage on 23rd October 2017, sought permission to approach the Secretary, Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee (DHCLSC) for legal assistance. On 19th February, 2018, the Court appointed an amicus curiae on W.P. (C) 3488/2017 Page 1 of 13 his...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:10. h December, 2019 LPA352013 & CM APPL. 614/2013 (stay) ISNI ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Purushaindra Kaurav, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sunny Chaudhary, and Ms. Anuradha Mishra, Advocates. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh, CGSC for UOI with Mr. Srivats Kaushal and Ms. Tejaswini, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % JUDGMENT Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The present appeal is directed against an order dated 21st November, 2011, passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Appellants writ petition being W.P.(C) No.174/2010. The present appeal also challenges a subsequent order dated 5th October, 2012 passed by the learned Single Judge, dismissing the Appellants Review Petition No.49/2011.2. The background facts are that the Appellant is a private limited company with its registered office in N...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Date of decision:10. h December, 2019 TEST.CAS. 64/2019 & IAs. 11492/2019 and 11493/2019 MR. SUNIL SETHI Through: Ms. Manali Singhal, Ms. Shreya Singhal, Mr. Deepak Rawal and Ms. Aanchal Kapoor, Advs. ........ Petitioner versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Kushagra Pandey, Panel Counsel for GNCTD. Ms. Ruchira Gupta and Mr. Anurag Sharma, Advs. for State of Goa. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-"In the facts and circumstances, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to: A. Grant Letters of Administration in favor of the... Petitioner, for the Estate both moveable and immovable of the Deceased (Late Mr. Sanjeve Sethi aka Mr Sanjeev Sethi) as specified in Schedule-B. Test Cas 64/2019 Page 1 of 8 B. Pass any other or further orders, as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:10. h December, 2019 + CM(M) 1457/2019 and CM APPL. 44339/2019, 44340/2019 HEMANT KUMAR SINGHAL ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. H.S. Gautam, Advocate (M:98182. 3060). versus INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Prem Chhetri, Mr. Promod Kumar and Ms. Sebika Lama, Advocates (M:79085. 7433). CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Prathiba M. Singh, J(Oral) 1. The... Petitioner/Defendant No.2 - Mr. Hemant Kumar Singhal (hereinafter Defendant No.2) is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 17th August, 2019 passed by the ld. ADJ allowing the application under Order XVIII Rule 3 CPC for leading evidence in rebuttal and evidence of an expert witness.2. The Respondent No.1/Plaintiff - Indian Overseas Bank (hereinafter Bank) filed a suit for recovery of Rs.5,71,920/- along with interest against Respondent No.2/Defendant No.1 - Mr. Praveen Kumar Jain who had allegedly taken a loan vide application dated 2nd March, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:18. h November, 2019 Pronounced on:10. h December, 2019 + W.P. (C) 7912/2018 WITH C.M. APPL. 30342-30343/2018 MRS. SHRABANI MONDAL UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.... Petitioner in person. Through: versus ..... Appellant ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Anand Varma, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH JUDGMENT Mr. Talwant Singh, J1 The... Petitioner has challenged the order and judgment dated 3rd January, 2018 in OA No.2053/2016 and order dated 9th February, 2018 in RA No.18/2018 passed by learned Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) and has further prayed for quashing and setting aside orders dated 4th May, 2016 and 27th January, 2016 as well as other proceedings. In brief, the case of the... Petitioner is that she joined All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in 2002 as Sister Grade-I. On 30th September, 2015 she was asked to handover the charge to another nurse and she was transferred to DNS. She was ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~30 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 5210/2019 and CM APPL. 23055/2019 (stay) RITESH SONI Through: Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate. ........ Petitioner versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr.Gaurav Rohilla, Sr. Govt. Counsel along with Mr.Shivanshu Tiwari, DC. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH % ORDER1012.2019 Dr. S. Muralidhar, J.:1. The challenge by the... Petitioner in the present case is to an order dated 6th August, 2018 passed by the Deputy Inspector General (DIG), SHQ of the Border Security Force (BSF), Siliguri directing the Commandant 155th BN BSF to conduct a de novo trial on the charge sheet issued to the... Petitioner. The... Petitioner also challenges an order dated 18th April, 2019 issued by the... RESPONDENTS in rejecting the... Petitioners representation against the commencement of the trial against him de novo.2. The background facts are that the... Petitioner, an Assistant Sub Inspector (Ministerial) [ASI(M)]. ha...
Tag this Judgment!