Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1912/2013 (Arjun Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1913/2013 (Sharwan Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2583/2014 (Sadhu Ram v. State of Raj.) (4)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2224/2015 (Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. State of Raj.) Date of Order ::19. h January, 2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. D.N.Yadav ]. Mr. Amit Sharma ]. Mr. K.R.Bhati ]. for the petitioners. Mr. H.S.Sandhu ]. Mr. JPS Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. ..... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE This reference is before us to adjudicate the following question :- WHETHER, the High Court exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C. and order that sentences awarded in two different cases shall run concurrently.. While making reference of the question to Larger Bench, the learned Single B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1912/2013 (Arjun Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1913/2013 (Sharwan Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2583/2014 (Sadhu Ram v. State of Raj.) (4)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2224/2015 (Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. State of Raj.) Date of Order ::19. h January, 2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. D.N.Yadav ]. Mr. Amit Sharma ]. Mr. K.R.Bhati ]. for the petitioners. Mr. H.S.Sandhu ]. Mr. JPS Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. ..... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE This reference is before us to adjudicate the following question :- WHETHER, the High Court exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C. and order that sentences awarded in two different cases shall run concurrently.. While making reference of the question to Larger Bench, the learned Single B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1912/2013 (Arjun Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1913/2013 (Sharwan Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2583/2014 (Sadhu Ram v. State of Raj.) (4)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2224/2015 (Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. State of Raj.) Date of Order ::19. h January, 2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. D.N.Yadav ]. Mr. Amit Sharma ]. Mr. K.R.Bhati ]. for the petitioners. Mr. H.S.Sandhu ]. Mr. JPS Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. ..... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE This reference is before us to adjudicate the following question :- WHETHER, the High Court exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C. and order that sentences awarded in two different cases shall run concurrently.. While making reference of the question to Larger Bench, the learned Single B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. ORDER (1)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1912/2013 (Arjun Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (2)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.1913/2013 (Sharwan Ram v. State of Raj. & Ors.) (3)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2583/2014 (Sadhu Ram v. State of Raj.) (4)DB Criminal Misc. Petition No.2224/2015 (Ramesh Kumar Gupta v. State of Raj.) Date of Order ::19. h January, 2016 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE MISS JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR Mr. D.N.Yadav ]. Mr. Amit Sharma ]. Mr. K.R.Bhati ]. for the petitioners. Mr. H.S.Sandhu ]. Mr. JPS Choudhary, Public Prosecutor. ..... BY THE COURT : (PER HON'BLE GOVIND MATHUR,J.) REPORTABLE This reference is before us to adjudicate the following question :- WHETHER, the High Court exercising powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., invoke Section 427 Cr.P.C. and order that sentences awarded in two different cases shall run concurrently.. While making reference of the question to Larger Bench, the learned Single B...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.C.S.A. No.709/2011 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton Industries Judgment, Wednesday, 13/01/2016 1 of 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.709/2011 State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. M/s Mamta Surgical Cotton Industries Date of Judgment :::: Wednesday 13/01/2016. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. O.P. Boob, for the appellants (State) Mr. Salil Trivedi on behalf of Mr. Sajjan Singh, for the respondent/plaintiff. -- 1. The appellants, State (District Collector, Bhilwara) and General Manager, District Industries Centre, Bhilwara, have preferred this second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, 1908, impugning the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2010 passed by learned first appellate court of learned Addl. District Judge, Gulabpura, Bhilwara, in Civil Appeal No.21/2007 (M/s Mamta Surgical Vs. State & Anr.) whereby the learned first appellate court allowed the first appeal decreeing the suit file...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.300/2013 The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Ruparam Judgment, Wednesday dated 13.01.2016 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: JUDGMENT :: S.B. CIVIL MISC.APPEAL NO.300/2013 The State of Rajasthan & Anr. Vs. Ruparam s/o Shri Kurdaram Date of Order :: Wednesday, 13th January, 2016. PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.S.M.Toshniwal, Addl.Govt.Counsel for the appellants. 1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellants-State of Rajasthan and another, against the order dated 05.10.2012 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Bhadara, District Hanumangarh in Reference Case No.75/2002 (166/2000) Rooparam Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., whereby the award dated 10.03.2009 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nohar, has been enhanced.2. Learned Additional Government Counsel, Mr.S.M.Toshniwal appearing for the State of Rajasthan submits that the present appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.133/2016 Devendra Singh versus Faulal & ORS.Judgment, Wednesday dated 13.01.2016 1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR :: JUDGMENT :: S.B.CIVIL MISC.APPEAL NO.133/2016 Devendra Singh s/o Shri Girdhari Singh versus Faulal s/o Shri Chhagan Lal & ORS.Date of Order :: Wednesday, 13th January, 2016. PRESENT HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Appearance: Mr.Rameshwar Dave for the plaintiff-appellant. 1. The plaintiff-appellant-Devendra Singh s/o Shri Girdhari Singh in the present suit for specific performance has filed the present appeal, aggrieved by the rejection of his temporary injunction application by the learned trial court of Additional District Judge, Jaitaran, District Pali vide order dated 20.10.2015 in Civil Misc. Case No.34/2012 Devendra Singh versus Faulal & Ors., with the following findings and observations:- 10. 5.12.2010 ! ! %& * - - 0 0 % * - 0 S.B.CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO.133/...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.C.S.A. No.59/1999 Gokul Das & Anr. Vs. Gurumuk Das Judgment, Wednesday, 13/01/2016 1 of 18 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Civil Second Appeal No.59/1999 Gokul Das S/o Sh. Tahel Ram Sindhi & Anr. Vs. Gurumuk Das S/o Aadumal Sindhi Date of Judgment :::: Wednesday 13/01/2016. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr. D.R. Bhandari, for the appellants/defendants/tenant. Mr. Manish Shshodia, for the respondent/plaintiff/landlord. -- 1. The appellants/defendants/tenants have preferred this second appeal under Section 100 of CPC, 1908, impugning the judgment and decree dated 17.02.1999 passed by learned first appellate court of learned Addl. District Judge No.2, Udaipur, in Civil Appeal No.10/1998 (Gokul Das & Anr. Vs. Gurumuk Das) whereby the learned first appellate court dismissed the first appeal filed by the defendants and affirmed the judgment and eviction decree dated 28.05.1997 passed by learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Udaipu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
S.B.C.F.A. No.4/2006 Sardarilal Vs. Gajanand Judgment, Wednesday, 13/01/2016 1 of 13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ::: JUDGMENT ::: S.B. Civil First Appeal No.4/2006 Sardarilal S/o S. Balaram, by caste Arora Vs. Gajanand S/o Sh. Manohalal Aggrawal Date of Judgment :::: Wednesday 13/01/2016. PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI REPORTABLE Mr. R.K. Thanvi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narendra Thanvi, for the appellant/plaintiff/landlord. Mr. Hemant Kumar Jain, for the respondent/defendant/tenant. -- 1. The appellant/plaintiff, Sardarilal S/o Sh. Balaram, has filed the present first appeal under Section 96 of CPC, 1908, aggrieved by rejection of his eviction suit filed for seeking eviction of the defendant/tenant, namely, Gajanand S/o Sh. Manoharlal, from the suit premises and recovery of due rent of Rs.31,500/- in respect of suit property, a residential house, situated at BF-25, Jawahar Nagar, Sri Ganganagar by the learned Additional District Judge No.2, Sri Ga...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER S.B.CRIMINAL REVISION NO.934/2013 Rajesh Kumar @ Raju. versus State of Rajasthan & Anr. Date of order : 6.1.2016 HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA Mr.Mukesh Mehriya, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Bhati, P.P.None appears for the respondent no.2 despite service. By way of this revision, the petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved of the judgment dated 4.10.2013 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jaitaran, District Pali in Criminal Appeal No.15/2010 whereby, the appellate court, while deciding the petitioners appeal against conviction, set aside the judgment dated 18.10.2010 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Bar, District Pali Criminal Regular Case No.10/1999 convicting and sentencing the petitioner and the respondent no.2 Shri Mahendra Kumar for the offence under Section 19/54 of the Rajasthan Excise Act and while remanding the matter, directed the trial Court to summon and examine a few more...
Tag this Judgment!