Anuj Ghaiand & Ors vs.state & Anr

Anuj Ghaiand & Ors vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 04, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1227036

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1227036
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Dec 04, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anuj Ghaiand & Ors

Advocate Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar, Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....is accepted by learned app for the state.6. with the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.7. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.11.2001 as per hindu rites and rituals. two children were born out of the wedlock namely, meagan and kiaan.8. respondent no.2 is personally present in court and has been identified by inspector virender dalal, sho/io, police station-malviya nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deeds dated 21.05.2019 and 24.05.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.10. learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present petition may be allowed in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.11. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c. 6216/2019 page 2 of 3 12. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at police station - malviya nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.13. the petition is allowed accordingly. dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge december04 2019 pb crl.m.c. 6216/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~64 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Date of decision:

04. 12.2019 ANUJ GHAIAND & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Saran Suri, Mr. Roshan Kumar and Mr. Shobhit Chandra Sharma, Advs. STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

versus Through: Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State with Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/ Malviya Nagar and SI Deepak Tanwar, PS - Malviya Nagar R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 41827/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 and CRL.M.A. 41826/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at Police Station- Malviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. Notice issued. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Page 1 of 3 5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

6. With the consent of the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

7. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 18.11.2001 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Two children were born out of the wedlock namely, Meagan and Kiaan.

8. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and has been identified by Inspector Virender Dalal, SHO/IO, Police Station-Malviya Nagar and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deeds dated 21.05.2019 and 24.05.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioners prays that the present petition may be allowed in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

11. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Page 2 of 3 12. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.609/2016 dated 28.07.2016, registered at Police Station - Malviya Nagar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

13. The petition is allowed accordingly. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER04 2019 PB CRL.M.C. 6216/2019 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Anuj Ghaiand & Ors vs State & Anr Same Subject Land Acquisition