Skip to content


Rajni Gupta @ Rajnee & Anr vs.the State & Ors - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided On
AppellantRajni Gupta @ Rajnee & Anr
RespondentThe State & Ors
Excerpt:
.....the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.6. respondent nos.2 & 3 are personally present in court and they have been identified by si sanjeev kumar/io and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.7. the petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 have amicably settled the matter.8. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.9. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.363/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at police station – vivek vihar, for the offences punishable under sections 3ipc and.....
Judgment:

$~3 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 3869/2019 Date of decision:

04. 12.2019 RAJNI GUPTA @ RAJNEE & ANR ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr.Anoop Kumar, Adv. with Mr.Vikas Saini, Mr.Manish Malik, Mr.Dinesh Madeshiya & Mr.Jai Subhash Thakur, Advs. versus THE STATE & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. SI Sanjeev Kumar PS Gandhi Nagar. Respondent nos.2&3 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek direction thereby quashing FIR No.363/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station – Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3
IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent nos.2 2.

3. & 3. CRL.M.C.3869/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 have no objection if the present petition is allowed.

6. Respondent Nos.2 & 3 are personally present in Court and they have been identified by SI Sanjeev Kumar/IO and submit that the matter has been settled and they do not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. The petitioners and respondent nos.2 & 3 have amicably settled the matter.

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.363/2014 dated 25.05.2014, registered at Police Station – Vivek Vihar, for the offences punishable under Sections 3
IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly. CRL.M.C.3869/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER04 2019 ab CRL.M.C.3869/2019 Page 3 of 3


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //