Explainer - Judgment Search Results

Vir Sales Corporation Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Ahd.)130

..... by account payee cheques drafts in view of the circumstances explained above 8 4 the contention of the learned counsel that ..... of searches carried out by the it department is often explained by taxpayers as representing loans taken from or deposits made ..... to countering the various devices adopted by the tax evaders for explaining their unaccounted cash found during the course of search or .....

K. Hari Prasad Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Hyd.)450

..... suffering from hypertension and paralysis under the circumstances it is explained that all his affairs are looked after by his son ..... of credit side the assessing officer asked the assessee to explain this whereupon the assessee had furnished trial balance as on ..... without producing them himself in discharge of his onus tried to explain away the statements of jagdish and gyaneswar by contending that .....

Gilmore Vs. Taylor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... id at 130 finally the judge gave the following instruction in an apparent attempt to explain the relation between the murder and the voluntary manslaughter charges as stated previously the defendant ..... to the constitution guarantee every criminal defendant the right to remain silent our precedents have explained that this right precludes the state from calling the defendant as a witness for the .....

Harper Vs. Virginia Dept. of Taxation

Court: US Supreme Court

..... fundamental rule of retrospective operation of judicial decisions the intimation is incorrect as i have explained before and will touch upon only briefly here w hen the court changes its mind ..... the presumptive validity of its statute was insufficient to preclude monetary relief ibid as we explained in american trucking assns the large burden of retroactive relief is largely irrelevant when a .....

Bray Vs. Alexandria Women's Health Clinic

Court: US Supreme Court

..... united states which is of course the basic distinction between the two provisions neither dissent explains why the application of enough force to impede law enforcement though not to overwhelm ..... goal the complete elimination of abortion services throughout the united states no lesser purpose can explain their multistate rescue operations even in a single locality the effect of petitioners blockade .....

N.K. Bapna Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1993CriLJ2199

..... the order and in considering the representations of the detenu petitioner has not been satisfactorily explained as pointed out in appreciable details by my learned brother the order of detention is ..... central jail sent the representation to the appropriate authority no attempt has been made to explain why the superintendent jail counter signed the representation on 9 12 92 though he received .....

Shaw Vs. Reno

Court: US Supreme Court

..... arlington heights v metropolitan housing development corp 429 u s 252 266 1977 as we explained in feeney a racial classification regardless of purported motivation is presumptively invalid and can be ..... written at length about these questions l my negative answer to each can be briefly explained the first question is easy there is no independent constitutional requirement of compactness or contiguity .....

P.K. Narayanan Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Reported in: (1994)49ITD229(Coch.)

..... of account and documents were seized the assessee was asked to explain the transactions as noticed in the books of account or ..... lease agreement found in his premises however subsequently the assessee had explained that sri ramesh did not know sri chellappan achari and ..... possession of papers relating to stock etc have been properly explained by the assessee no worthwhile enquiry was made either with .....

Sale Vs. Haitian Centers Council, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... deportation proceedings there is no change in the 1980 amendment however that could only be explained by an assumption that congress also intended to provide for the statute s extraterritorial ..... negotiating conference of plenipotentiaries held in geneva switzerland on july 11 1951 the swiss delegate explained his understanding that the words expel and return covered only refugees who had entered the .....

Withrow Vs. Williams

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the federal courts power to issue writs ordering the release of state prisoners this court explained that courts could accommodate federalism and comity concerns by withholding relief until after state ..... the same point 18 years earlier t he deterrent value of permitting collateral attack he explained goes beyond the point of diminishing returns friendly is innocence irrelevant collateral attack on .....