Explainer - Year 1939 - Judgments

Oct 12 1939 (PC)

Dasharath Supadu Ladsake Vs. Gopal Bhila Gadhari

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-12-1939

Reported in: AIR1940Bom48; (1940)42BOMLR276

..... i l r 46 bom 719 s c 24 bom l r 284 distinguished and explained latafat ali khan v kalyan mal 1938 all 342 referred to 5 no doubt the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 19 1939 (PC)

Pakala Narayana Swami Vs. Emperor

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-19-1939

Reported in: (1939)41BOMLR428

..... sections 161 and 162 of the criminal procedure code and section 27 of the indian evidence act explained confession admission distinction between meaning of confession intention of legislature intention no guide where language .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 1939 (PC)

Shriram Hanutram Vs. Mohanlal and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-08-1939

Reported in: AIR1940Bom93; (1939)41BOMLR1293

..... 3 lah 296 followed rambaksh v bombay cotton co 1930 32 bom l r 1451 explained in the present case as the contract itself is in dispute i do not think .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 16 1939 (PC)

Purushottam Damodar Raichurkar Vs. Gangadhar Kashinath Sakhare

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-16-1939

Reported in: AIR1939Bom445; (1939)41BOMLR931

..... nathu ram 1926 l r 54 i a 79 s c bom l r 825 explained abhyankar for the appellants contends that the mortgage is good for the full amount purported .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 1939 (PC)

Bai Ratangavri Vs. Manilal Mahipatram Mehta

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-09-1939

Reported in: AIR1940Bom153; (1940)42BOMLR186

..... the apertures in the upper wall imambhai v rahimbhai 1925 27 bom l r 503 explained rajubhai v lalbhai 1925 28 bom l r 1000 referred to 2 the defendant intended .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1939 (PC)

His Highness Sri Sri Sri Lieut-col. Sir Rajah Velugoti Govinda Krishna ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-10-1939

Reported in: (1939)1MLJ831

..... to conduct only significant in the light of these decisions now explained 23 i read lord blanesburgh s judgment in this way it ..... is rendered as agnate which term again the official interpreter rightly explained as referring to collateral agnatic relations it is unusual to refer ..... the rule of primogeniture this reference is perhaps capable of being explained away on the ground that it may be regarded as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1939 (PC)

Harimati Debi and anr. Vs. Anath Nath Roy Choudhury

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-27-1939

Reported in: AIR1939Cal535

..... delay in making the application for letters of administration has been explained the lower court has held that it has been accounted ..... circumstance and a significant fact the evidence that has been adduced explaining the circumstance is utterly untrustworthy in this connexion i may ..... he can be called either to deny his signature or to explain the circumstances in which it was attached it is essential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 10 1939 (PC)

Pattu Kumari Bibi W/O Rai Dhanpat Singh Nawlakha Vs. Nirmal Kumar Sing ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-10-1939

Reported in: AIR1939Cal569

..... no 230 of 1936 in our opinion the payments can only be explained on the footing that they were made under the solenama they thus ..... which she was to lease back to him simultaneously has also been explained by the defendant in his evidence it was really a device to ..... as a whole we find nothing in its provisions which cannot be explained as the natural result of the circumstances of the time and the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 20 1939 (PC)

Sakti Nath Roy Choudhury Vs. Jessore United Bank Ltd. (Registered)

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-20-1939

Reported in: AIR1939Cal403

..... property may be situated the language employed by him implies as he himself explained in a later case gopi mohan v doybaki nandan 1892 19 cal ..... pal 1894 21 cal 639 where however an attempt was made to explain the full bench decision in prem chand dey v mokhada devi 1890 ..... nadan v muthusami pillai 1920 7 a i r mad 427 was explained the patna and lahore high courts have also taken the same view .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 13 1939 (PC)

Vedantam Subbarayudu (Dead) and ors. Vs. Chattapalli Lakshminarasamma ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-13-1939

Reported in: AIR1939Mad949; (1939)2MLJ533

..... and the other on the ground that it was not i shall first explain the scope of the rule in toulmin v sieere 1817 3 mer ..... far as possible the limit of the rule as enunciated therein is thus explained by lord macnaughten in thorne v cann 1895 a c 18 a ..... paid off does not decide the question whether it is extinguished proceeded to explain in what cases it could be said to have extinguished and in what .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explainer - Judgment Search Results