Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Year: 1922 Page 1 of about 221 results (0.02 seconds)Khimchand Narotamdas Bhavsar Vs. Sobhagchand Bhogilal
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-18-1922
Reported in: AIR1923Bom206; (1923)25BOMLR242
..... but not otherwise ramasami naiken v venkatasami naiken 1919 i l r 43 mad 61 explained there cannot be a sound exercise of discretion by a court where there is an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGopala Chetty Vs. Vijayaraghavachariar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-09-1922
Reported in: (1922)24BOMLR1197
..... the indian limitation act 1908 knox v gye 1872 l r 5 h l 656 explained merwanji hormusji v rustomji burjorji 1882 i l r 6 bom 628 sokkanadha vannimundar v .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaruti Balaji Patil Vs. Dattu Mukunda Savant
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Dec-01-1922
Reported in: AIR1923Bom253(1); (1923)25BOMLR192
..... could give title to the plaintiff thama v govind 1907 9 bom l r 401 explained it is unfortunate for the plaintiff that he was unable to prove his document but .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatappa Jakappa Kochcheri Vs. Annappa Basappa Patil
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-29-1922
Reported in: AIR1923Bom82; (1922)24BOMLR1284; 76Ind.Cas.115
..... of one party at some stage madhav v jairam 1921 23 bom l r 540 explained though the learned judge was satisfied that there was mutual and current account between the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMusammat Hiria Vs. Ram AdhIn Singh
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jun-27-1922
Reported in: AIR1923All335; 75Ind.Cas.553
..... his account books it was under the circumstances for the lambardar to explain why such a large sum had remained uncollected this case was followed ..... defendant it would have to be seen how he has tried to explain it all that has been shown on his behalf is that ..... my opinion the burden having been shifted on to the defendant to explain the low collections has not been discharged by him it is noteworthy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC. Sundaram Aiyar Vs. Raja Rajeswara Muthuramalinga, Sethupathi Avergh ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-11-1922
Reported in: (1923)44MLJ279
..... copy of the decree appealed against was filed and that an affidavit explaining the cause of the delay should be filed on the 20th january ..... either by the appellant or his dewan or any other person explaining why a copy of the decree was not sent along with the ..... explanation i am of opinion that the delay has not been properly explained i am after hearing the petitioner of opinion that the long delay .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTYadavalli Tripuramba (Dead) and anr. Vs. Yadavalli Venkataratnam (Dead ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Dec-20-1922
Reported in: (1923)44MLJ349
..... ramakishore acharj choudhnry 1865 10 m i a 279 which judgment was explained and the principle re affirmed in pudma coomari debt v the ..... the decision in which case appears to be right both the judges explained what they understood to have been decided by the privy council ..... be coupled with the capacity to continue the line as previously explained that is coupled with a legal marriage it is only from .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBritish Columbia Mills Tug and Barge Co. Vs. Myrolie
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-15-1922
..... and went along to help the captain of the tug as he explained because the captain of the tug was not used to outside work ..... work safely this seems to have been understood by the crew and explains why it was that the helmsman said that he obeyed the orders ..... of bjerre and why the mate explained that he obeyed bjerre s orders because he represented the owners indeed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPudiava Nadan Vs. Pavanasa Nadan and ors.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-20-1922
Reported in: AIR1923Mad215; (1922)43MLJ596
..... the born blind take a share i think it is to be explained as it was in the case referred to above in the ..... passage the sarasvati vilasa is using the expression take a share to explain that though disqualified such persons have a latent right which will ..... be maintained excluding them from participation 14 placitum 3 of section 10 explains this as follows under the term others are comprehended one who .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishori Lal Vs. Jiwan Lal and anr.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Jan-16-1922
Reported in: AIR1923All242; 67Ind.Cas.231
..... more specific he clearly entered into the contract as an agent he explains that in such cases he purchases for his customers and asks them ..... was an agency contrast because he goes out of his way to explain the reason why his own firm s name was inserted in the ..... to kishori lal the purchaser indeed that is usually the case and explains the need for the employment of an agent or middle man although .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial