Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Year: 1946 Page 1 of about 143 results (0.007 seconds)Dayabhai Jivabhai Patel Vs. Shana Bana Pagi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-1946
Reported in: AIR1947Bom190; (1946)48BOMLR627
..... under section 10a of the act sawantrawa v giriappa 1913 15 bom l r 778 explained ganpat v tulsi 1923 26 bom i r 118 followed section 31 4 since repealed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKanhayalal Supdubhai Vs. Hiralal Deoram
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-1946
Reported in: AIR1947Bom255; (1946)48BOMLR795
..... yi 1939 l r 66 i a 198 s c 41 bom l r 742 explained abdul sac v sundara mudaliar 1930 i l r 54 mad 81 and jujishti panda .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhavaniprasad Shaligram Vs. Naranibai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-26-1946
Reported in: (1947)49BOMLR554
..... miya 1923 i i r 47 bom 778 s c 25 bom l r 810 explained
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMuppanna Malkappa Humbi Vs. Shree Gajanan Urban Co-operative Bank, Ltd ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-01-1946
Reported in: AIR1947Bom375; (1947)49BOMLR168
..... 807 followed hanmant bhimrao v gururao swamirao 1942 44 bom l r 880 distinguished and explained smith v baker 1873 l r 8 c p 350 buckland v johnson 1854 15 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSm. Karunamoyee Debi Vs. Sm. Maya Moyi Debi and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-26-1946
Reported in: AIR1948Cal84
..... for a deed surrender and partition or whether their implication was explained to her initially sushil the eldest son of debendra says ..... before the execution nihar read the documents and hari gopal explained the contents to his mother and mashima and said that ..... surrender and he read it to karunamoyee and mayamoyee and harigopal explained it to them before execution karunamoyee he says signed after .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTO.C. Ganguly Vs. Kamalpat Sing Dugar
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jul-16-1946
Reported in: AIR1947Cal236
..... a licence as to what interest in land means it has been explained in numerous cases that where the owner transfers the rights of ownership ..... the case in secy of state v bhupal chandra 17 air1930cal739 they explain the true nature of a licence with the assistance of other case ..... and there will be no decree on the ground mentioned there as explained already where the tenant is a defaulter para 9 1 house .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGeneral Family Pension Fund Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengal.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-12-1946
Reported in: [1946]14ITR488(Cal)
..... observation in styles case with respect to a mutual assurance company explain the length to which that noble lords observations should be considered ..... or the surplus from them are not taxable styles case as explained by cornishs case is not an authority that a mutual ..... considered there can be no process of attribution i should to explain myself better enlarge slightly on these two reasons in the first .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhaterpati Pratap Bahadur Sahi and Others Vs. Lachmidhar Prasad Singh ...
Court: Privy Council
Decided on: Jul-29-1946
..... namely her husband and the rest as will be forthwith explained 10 the kinsmen have been declared generally to be competent ..... to the father according to the principle set forth while explaining the term parents pitarau in the text of yajnavalkya the ..... was contended before their lordships that the viramitrodaya commenting on and explaining the above text of yajnavalkya intended to place agnates and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re Yamashita
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-04-1946
..... of article 15 and the accompanying amendment of article 25 in explaining the purpose of article 15 said article 15 is new we ..... appendix to s rep 230 64th cong 1st sess general crowder explained at greater length article 15 is new we have included in ..... military commissions courts of inquiry and military boards mr sweet please explain what you mean by military commission gen crowder that is our .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhaterpati Pratap Bahadur Vs. Lachmidhar Prasad Singh
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-29-1946
Reported in: (1947)49BOMLR130
..... namely her husband and the rest as will be forthwith explained 10 the kinsmen have been declared generally to be competent ..... to the father according to the principle set forth while explaining the terra parents pitarau in the text of yajnavalkya the ..... was contended before their lordships that the viramitrodaya commenting on and explaining the above text of yajnavalkya intended to place agnates and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial