Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Sorted by: recent Year: 1993 Page 1 of about 1,606 results (0.052 seconds)income-tax Officer Vs. Ambica Agencies
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad
Decided on: Dec-31-1993
Reported in: (1994)50ITD31(Hyd.)
..... are reached which are of conclusive nature from which the assessee cannot wriggle out cannot explain away and cannot but admit the concealed income then only it can be said to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSteel Trading Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh
Decided on: Dec-31-1993
Reported in: (1994)49ITD496(Chd.)
..... paid as fine the return was accompanied by a covering letter in which it was explained that amount of rs 12 500 was being surrendered to buy peace otherwise it was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTV.V. Trans-investments (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-31-1993
Reported in: 1994(2)ALT87; (1994)119CTR(AP)184; [1994]207ITR508(AP)
..... is stated that the department was not given full opportunity to explain its view point therefore the order of the special bench is ..... 31 ch d 607 in the following words this court also explained the doctrine of incorporation by reference in similar terms in shamrao ..... section 2 the doctrine of incorporation by reference has been succinctly explained by lord esher m 57 from the above it follows that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSangita Trust No. 1 Vs. Wealth-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad
Decided on: Dec-30-1993
Reported in: (1994)50ITD66(Ahd.)
..... section 21 was incorporated in the statute book by making a reference to the memorandum explaining the provisions of the finance bill of 1970 published in 1970 75 itr st 81 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. T. K. Jayraj Vs. Income-tax Officer.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Dec-29-1993
Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Coch.)431
..... assessee had paid advance tax of rs 22 728 hence the minor child had to explain the increase in investment to the extent of rs 63 404 as against this the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Shimla Ghiya Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur
Decided on: Dec-29-1993
Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(JP.)91
..... has been derived but in the instant case the assessee had explained that she had derived money after marriage on festivals etc which ..... us 4 in this background the learned counsel for the assessee explained that in her first statement the assessee had stated as to ..... that in this year in response to question no 7 she explained in detail about her ill health and disturbed mental condition during .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKerala Transport Company Vs. Assistant Commissioner of
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Dec-28-1993
Reported in: (1994)50TTJ(Coch.)435
..... assessee had claimed an expenditure of rs 50 60 274 as claims made it was explained that the said amount included provision relating to claims against loss and damaged goods to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Vs. Kerala Transport Co.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Dec-28-1993
Reported in: (1994)51ITD405(Coch.)
..... to condone the delay which was happened due to circumstances explained above and entertain the appeal now filed however at the time ..... the appeal and on a careful consideration of the circumstances explained by the assessee in its petition for condonation of the technical ..... the credits exist the onus is on the assessee to explain them satisfactorily and there is no indication in the appellate order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTA.M. Moosa Vs. Income Tax Officer. (ito V. A.M.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Dec-28-1993
Reported in: (1994)49TTJ(Coch.)343
..... exports are made by him and sale proceeds are received by him directly sri srinivasan explained that some times the assessee gets orders through export houses the export houses receive import .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGordon Woodroffe Ltd. Vs. Trident Investment and Portfolio
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-27-1993
Reported in: (1994)79CompCas764
..... of the companies act and ii violation of the provisions of the listing agreement 9 explaining in detail the difference between section 22a 3 b and 22a 3 c of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial